Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 25:13:791572.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.791572. eCollection 2022.

Intersectional Invisibility in Women's Diversity Interventions

Affiliations

Intersectional Invisibility in Women's Diversity Interventions

Chuk Yan E Wong et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Many diversity interventions for women are ineffective. One reason for this may be that the field that diversity interventions are usually based on, the social sciences, often do not consider intra-group differences among women. Specifically, differences by racialization may be excluded from such diversity interventions. The present research examines whether racially marginalized women have different diversity interventions needs than White women, and whether organizations are less likely to represent those needs (i.e., intersectional invisibility). Across an open-ended coding (n = 293) and a ranking study (n = 489), Black women noted a need to incorporate intersectional differences, Asian women prioritized methods to address challenges to their authority, and White women indicated a need to address agency perceptions. Improving work-life balance and networks was a shared concern among participants, though we theorized different racially gendered reasons for why these intervention needs are relevant to each group. In Study 3 (n = 92 organizations), we analyzed organizations' websites using word count and textual analysis. Organizations- including the Education, Science, and Research sector- most readily advocated for women through enhancing agency. They were also less likely to mention dealing with perceptions of excessive agency or addressing intersectional considerations. The organizations broadly mentioned other marginalized groups besides women, but rarely did they do so intersectionality. Taken together, our findings demonstrate different intervention priorities across differently racialized groups. We found evidence of intersectional invisibility where organizations were more likely to address agency-enhancing intervention needs while failing to include other intervention needs relevant for Black women and Asian women. We discuss the implications of these findings for organizations, in general, as well as potential implications for the field of academic social sciences.

Keywords: diversity intervention; gender; inclusion; intersectionality; multiple identities; race.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Proportions of intervention needs as a function of racialized group.

References

    1. Ahern G. (2019). Overworked and Isolated: the Rising Epidemic of Loneliness in Academia: NPJ Science of Learning. Available online at: https://npjscilearncommunity.nature.com/posts/43686-overworked-and-isola... [accessed on March 5, 2019]
    1. Alfred M. V., Ray S. M., Johnson M. A. (2019). Advancing women of color in STEM: an imperative for U.S. global competitiveness. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 21 114–132. 10.1177/1523422318814551 - DOI
    1. Annabi H., Lebovitz S. (2018). Improving the retention of women in the IT workforce: an investigation of gender diversity interventions in the USA. Inform. Syst. J. 28 1049–1081. 10.1111/isj.12182 - DOI
    1. Apfelbaum E. P., Stephens N. M., Reagans R. E. (2016). Beyond one-size-fits-all: tailoring diversity approaches to the representation of social groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 111 547–566. 10.1037/pspi0000071 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arends-Tóth J., Van De Vijver F. J. R. (2003). Multiculturalism and acculturation: views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 33 249–266. 10.1002/ejsp.143 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources