Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;6(1):53-62.
doi: 10.1007/s41686-022-00066-0. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

This School is Made for Students: Students' Perspectives on PBL

Affiliations

This School is Made for Students: Students' Perspectives on PBL

Nate Turcotte et al. J Form Des Learn. 2022.

Abstract

Project-based learning (PBL) is an increasingly popular pedagogical method in K-12 settings. Students exposed to this approach have demonstrated higher academic performance than their peers who have not been exposed, as well as positive rates of self-efficacy and other non-academic skills. Using qualitative methods, including observation, artifact collection, interviews, and focus groups, this research explores biology students' perceptions of their project-based learning experiences. In particular, we leverage a student focus group to understand how students perceive their learning experience. In this focus group, students perceive project-based learning as a positive influence on their agency, self-efficacy, and learning experience as a whole. Significantly, students' accounts reveal how their positive perceptions of PBL correspond with purposefully designed elements of project-based learning. This article offers implications for teachers and educational leaders interested in how students perceive project-based learning and how they might integrate project-based learning into their classrooms.

Keywords: Project-based learning; Qualitative research; Student voice and choice; Student-centered learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Researcher positioning during group work
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Lionfish meal
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Students practicing their presentations
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Students providing feedback and reflecting on group presentations

References

    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. - DOI
    1. Brown. T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business.
    1. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
    1. Duffy TM, Raymer PL. A practical guide and a constructivist rationale for inquiry based learning. Educational Technology. 2010;50(4):3–15.
    1. Duke NK, Halvorsen A-L, Strachan SL. Project-based learning not just for STEM anymore. Phi Delta Kappan. 2016;98(1):14–19. doi: 10.1177/0031721716666047. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources