Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
- PMID: 35693996
- PMCID: PMC9174389
- DOI: 10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3
Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening.
Methods: A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis.
Results: The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was -12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to -8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used.
Conclusion: CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value.
Keywords: 50-g glucose challenge test; Accuracy; Capillary blood glucose; Gestational diabetes; Venous plasma glucose.
© The Japan Diabetes Society 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestNone.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Use of capillary blood glucose for screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in resource-constrained settings.Acta Diabetol. 2016 Feb;53(1):91-7. doi: 10.1007/s00592-015-0761-9. Epub 2015 Apr 28. Acta Diabetol. 2016. PMID: 25916215 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Problems in screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by measurement of casual blood glucose levels at 24-28 gestational weeks.J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Dec;15(12):1797-1802. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14310. Epub 2024 Sep 18. J Diabetes Investig. 2024. PMID: 39292175 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of capillary whole blood versus venous plasma glucose estimations in screening for diabetes mellitus in epidemiological studies in developing countries.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 May;13(5):586-91. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0218. Epub 2011 Mar 15. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011. PMID: 21406012
-
The screening performance of glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):7590-7600. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1956896. Epub 2021 Jul 29. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022. PMID: 34325609
-
Screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Oct;(210):1-327. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012. PMID: 24423035 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Longitudinal Assessment of Metabolic Syndrome.J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 24;14(3):747. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030747. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 39941416 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No 190: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(2):49–64. - PubMed
-
- Hod M, Kapur A, Sacks DA, Hadar E, Agarwal M, Di Renzo GC, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: a pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 3):S173–211. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(15)30033-3. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous