Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;11(5):837-846.
doi: 10.21037/gs-22-168.

Effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on recovery after laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on recovery after laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yulian Chen et al. Gland Surg. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: Surgery is the recommended treatment for uterine leiomyoma but it still has issues like postoperative complications and slow recovery. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol could probably reduce traumatic stress and promote the rapid postoperative recovery of patients, but there are controversies for the results of different studies. This meta-analysis was performed to resolve the controversies and provide evidence for the application of ERAS in gynecology.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Ovid, CNKI (China), Wanfang Data (China), and Google Scholar databases were searched to recruit all studies on the application of ERAS in laparoscopic myomectomy up to November 2021. The inclusion criteria of studies was established according to the PICOS principles. the Cochrane RoB 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) scale were used to assess the bias of the studies, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.

Results: Ten studies that met the criteria were finally included with 1,441 participants. Eight of them were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two were cohort studies, all of them were with low level of bias. Meta-analysis showed that ERAS protocol after laparoscopic myomectomy could significantly shorten the first time getting out of bed after surgery [mean difference (MD) =-4.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): (-7.35, -2.36); P=0.0001], the first defecation time after surgery [MD =-4.69; 95% CI: (-5.68, -3.69); P<0.00001], and the postoperative hospital stay [MD =-1.32, 95% CI: (-2.08, -0.56); P=0.0007]. It could also markedly reduce the patient readmission rate [odds ratio (OR) =0.42; 95% CI: (0.23, 0.76); P=0.004], and notably reduced the incidence of complications [OR =0.37; 95% CI: (0.22, 0.61); Z=3.82; P=0.0001]. Yet, the cost of the ERAS protocol was not significantly different from that of routine care [MD =-127.76, 95% CI: (-997.19, 741.66); P=0.77].

Discussion: The application of ERAS protocol after gynecological laparoscopic myomectomy can shorten the first defecation time, first time out of bed, hospital stay, and reduce the readmission rate as well as the incidence of postoperative complications, without additional costs. But still there was heterogeneity among the studies, the topic still deserved further exploration.

Keywords: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); laparoscopy; myomectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-22-168/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature screening flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of the ERAS care model on the first time the patient gets out of bed after surgery (11,13,15,18,19). SD, standard deviation; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of the ERAS care model on the first defecation time of patients after surgery (11-13,15,16,18,19). SD, standard deviation; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of the ERAS care model on postoperative hospital stay of patients (11-13,15,16,18,19). SD, standard deviation; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cost of the ERAS care model compared to routine care (11,14,18). SD, standard deviation; IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval; RCTs, randomized controlled trials; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of the ERAS care model on the postoperative readmission rate (10,14,15,18). M-H, Mantel-Haenszel; CI, confidence interval; RCTs, randomized controlled trials; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Impact of the ERAS care model on the incidence rate of postoperative complications (11-13,15,17,19). M-H, Mantel-Haenszel; CI, confidence interval; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Funnel plot analysis. SE, standard error; MD, mean difference.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The Egger’ test. SND, standard normal deviation; CI, confidential interval.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lethaby A, Puscasiu L, Vollenhoven B. Preoperative medical therapy before surgery for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;11:CD000547. 10.1002/14651858.CD000547.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whynott RM, Vaught KCC, Segars JH. The Effect of Uterine Fibroids on Infertility: A Systematic Review. Semin Reprod Med 2017;35:523-32. 10.1055/s-0037-1607295 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhave Chittawar P, Franik S, Pouwer AW, et al. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(10):CD004638. 10.1002/14651858.CD004638.pub3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zullo F, Venturella R, Raffone A, et al. In-bag manual versus uncontained power morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;5:CD013352. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Panagiotopoulou N, Nethra S, Karavolos S, et al. Uterine-sparing minimally invasive interventions in women with uterine fibroids: a systematic review and indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:858-67. 10.1111/aogs.12441 - DOI - PubMed