Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 7;15(17):e202200898.
doi: 10.1002/cssc.202200898. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

Photocatalyzed Functionalization of Alkenoic Acids in 3D-Printed Reactors

Affiliations

Photocatalyzed Functionalization of Alkenoic Acids in 3D-Printed Reactors

Alexandra Jorea et al. ChemSusChem. .

Abstract

The valorization of alkenoic acids possibly deriving from biomass (fumaric and citraconic acids) was carried out through conversion in important building blocks, such as γ-keto acids and succinic acid derivatives. The functionalization was carried out by addition onto the C=C double bond of radicals generated under photocatalyzed conditions from suitable hydrogen donors (mainly aldehydes) and by adopting a decatungstate salt as the photocatalyst. Syntheses were performed under batch (in a glass vessel) and flow (by using 3D-printed reactors) conditions. The design of the latter reactors allowed for an improved yield and productivity.

Keywords: 3D-printed reactors; carboxylic acids; flow chemistry; photocatalysis; radical reactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
a) Biomass‐derived alkenoic acids tested in this work. b) Decatungstate photocatalyzed addition of aldehydes onto alkenoic acids.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Photocatalyzed functionalization of fumaric acid 1 a. Isolated yields for reactions performed under batch (2.5 mmol scale) or flow conditions (3D‐printed Reactor A–1.0 mmol scale; figures within parentheses on gray background). Typical reaction conditions: A solution of fumaric acid 1 a (0.1 m), hydrogen donors 2 av (0.15–2 m) and TBADT (2 mol%) in a MeCN : H2O 9 : 1 mixture was deaerated by argon bubbling for 10 min and irradiated using a 370 nm LED lamp (see Supporting Information for details). [a] Irradiation performed at 390 nm. [b] Reaction medium: MeCN/CH2Cl2 5 : 1 mixture; reaction not performed under flow conditions due to incompatibility issues with the reactor material.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Photocatalyzed functionalization of citraconic acid 1 b. Isolated yields for reactions performed under batch (2.5 mmol scale) of flow conditions (3D‐printed Reactor A–1.0 mmol scale; figures among parentheses on a gray background). Typical reaction conditions: A solution of citraconic acid 1 b (0.1 m), hydrogen donors 2 au (0.15–1 m) and TBADT (2 mol %) in MeCN was deaerated by argon bubbling for 10 min and irradiated using a 370 nm LED lamp (see Supporting Information for details). [a] Only major diastereoisomer shown; the reaction between 1 b and 2 s delivered product 4 s as a 1.5 : 1 diastereoisomeric mixture arising, respectively, from the anti and syn addition to the double bond. [b] Only major diastereoisomer shown; the reaction between 1 b and 2 t delivered product 4 t as a 4.5 : 1 diastereoisomeric mixture arising, respectively, from the anti and syn addition to the double bond. [c] Reaction medium: MeCN/CH2Cl2 5 : 1 mixture; reaction not performed under flow conditions due to incompatibility issues with the reactor material.
Figure 1
Figure 1
ORTEP view of 4 o with labeling scheme (thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 30 % probability level).
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Proposed reaction mechanism.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
Diastereoselectivity in the radical addition onto 1 b.

References

    1. Lynd L. R., Laser M. S., Bransby D., Dale B. E., Davison B., Hamilton R., Himmel M., Keller M., McMillan J. D., Sheehan J., Wyman C. E., Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 169–172. - PubMed
    1. Werpy T., Petersen G., Top value added chemicals from biomass: volume I – results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas, Washington DC: US Department of Energy (US) 2004.
    1. Foley P. M., Beach E. S., Zimmerman J. B., Green Chem. 2011, 13, 1399–1405.
    1. Anastas P. T., Zimmerman J. B., Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 94A–101A. - PubMed
    1. Isikgor F. H., Becer C. R., Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 4497–4559.

LinkOut - more resources