Prospective assessment of aneurysmal rupture risk scores in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a multicentric cohort
- PMID: 35695927
- DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-02987-w
Prospective assessment of aneurysmal rupture risk scores in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a multicentric cohort
Abstract
Purpose: The natural evolution of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) is indeed difficult to predict at the individual level.
Objective: In a large prospective multicentric European cohort, we aimed to evaluate whether the PHASES, UCAS, and ELPASS scores in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage would have predicted a high risk of aneurysmal rupture or growth.
Methods: Academic centers treating patients with intracranial aneurysms were invited to prospectively collect de-identified data from all patients admitted at their institution for a subarachnoid hemorrhage-related to intracranial aneurysmal rupture between January 1 and March 31, 2021 through a trainee-led research collaborative network. Each responding center was provided with an electronic case record form (CRF) which collected all the elements of the PHASES, ELAPSS, and UCAS scores.
Results: A total of 319 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were included at 17 centers during a 3-month period. One hundred eighty-three aneurysms (57%) were less than 7 mm. The majority of aneurysms were located on the anterior communicating artery (n = 131, 41%). One hundred eighty-four patients (57%), 103 patients (32%), and 58 (18%) were classified as having a low risk of rupture or growth, according to the PHASES, UCAS, and ELAPSS scores, respectively.
Conclusion: In a prospective study of European patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, we showed that 3 common risk-assessment tools designed for patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms would have not identified most patients to be at high or intermediate risk for rupture, questioning their use for decision-making in the setting of unruptured aneurysms.
Keywords: Aneurysm; Subarachnoid hemorrhage.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, Rinkel GJ (2011) Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 10:626–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rinkel GJE, Djibuti M, Algra A, van Gijn J (1998) Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 29:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.29.1.251 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Komotar RJ, Mocco J, Solomon RA (2008) Guidelines for the surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms - controversies in the management of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 62:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000311076.64109.2E - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gregory TB, Brown RD, Sepideh A-H et al (2015) Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 46:2368–2400. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000070 - DOI
-
- Tominari S, Morita A, Ishibashi T et al (2015) Prediction model for 3-year rupture risk of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in Japanese patients: cerebral aneurysm rupture risk. Ann Neurol 77:1050–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24400 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical