Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022:2495:29-46.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2301-5_2.

Tools for Efficient Genome Editing; ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR

Affiliations
Review

Tools for Efficient Genome Editing; ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR

Yasaman Shamshirgaran et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2022.

Abstract

The last two decades have marked significant advancement in the genome editing field. Three generations of programmable nucleases (ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas system) have been adopted to introduce targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in eukaryotic cells. DNA repair machinery of the cells has been exploited to introduce insertion and deletions (indels) at the targeted DSBs to study function of any gene-of-interest. The resulting indels were generally assumed to be "random" events produced by "error-prone" DNA repair pathways. However, recent advances in computational tools developed to study the Cas9-induced mutations have changed the consensus and implied the "non-randomness" nature of these mutations. Furthermore, CRISPR-centric tools are evolving at an unprecedented pace, for example, base- and prime-editors are the newest developments that have been added to the genome editing toolbox. Altogether, genome editing tools have revolutionized our way of conducting research in life sciences. Here, we present a concise overview of genome editing tools and describe the DNA repair pathways underlying the generation of genome editing outcome.

Keywords: Cas9; DNA repair; Genome editing; TALEN; ZFN.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kim YG, Cha J, Chandrasegaran S (1996) Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:1156–1160. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.3.1156 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Klug A, Rhodes D (1987) Zinc fingers: a novel protein fold for nucleic acid recognition. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 52:473–482. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1987.052.01.054 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cassandri M, Smirnov A, Novelli F et al (2017) Zinc-finger proteins in health and disease. Cell Death Discov 3:1–2 - DOI
    1. Doyon Y, Vo TD, Mendel MC et al (2011) Enhancing zinc-finger-nuclease activity with improved obligate heterodimeric architectures. Nat Methods 8:74–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1539 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Urnov FD, Miller JC, Lee YL et al (2005) Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 435:646–651. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03556 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources