Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 13;17(6):e0261048.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261048. eCollection 2022.

Multivariate characterisation of morpho-biometric traits of indigenous helmeted Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) in Nigeria

Affiliations

Multivariate characterisation of morpho-biometric traits of indigenous helmeted Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) in Nigeria

Abdulmojeed Yakubu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

This study was conducted to characterise phenotypically helmeted Guinea fowls in three agro-ecologies in Nigeria using multivariate approach. Eighteen biometric characters, four morphological indices and eleven qualitative physical traits were investigated in a total of 569 adult birds (158 males and 411 females). Descriptive statistics, non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by the Mann-Whitney U and Dunn-Bonferroni tests for post hoc, Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA), Univariate Analysis, Canonical Discriminant Analysis, Categorical Principal Component Analysis and Decision Trees were employed to discern the effects of agro-ecological zone and sex on the morphostructural parameters. Agro-ecology had significant effect (P<0.05; P<0.01) on all the colour traits. In general, the most frequently observed colour phenotype of Guinea fowl had pearl plumage colour (54.0%), pale red skin colour (94.2%), black shank colour (68.7%), brown eye colour (49.7%), white earlobe colour (54.8%) and brown helmet colour (72.6%). The frequencies of helmet shape and wattle size were significantly influenced (P<0.01) by agro-ecology and sex. Overall, birds from the Southern Guinea Savanna zone had significantly higher values (P<0.05) for most biometric traits compared to their Sudano-Sahelian and Tropical Rainforest counterparts. They were also more compact (120.00 vs. 110.00 vs. 107.69) but had lesser condition index (7.66 vs. 9.45 vs. 9.30) and lower long-leggedness (19.71 vs. 19.23 vs. 9.51) than their counterparts from the two other zones. Sexual dimorphism (P<0.05) was in favour of male birds especially those in Southern Guinea Savanna and Sudano-Sahelian zones. However, the MCA and discriminant analysis revealed considerable intermingling of the qualitative physical traits, biometric traits and body indices especially between the Sudano-Sahelian and Tropical Rainforest birds. In spite of the high level of genetic admixture, the Guinea fowl populations could to a relative extent be distinguished using wing length, body length and eye colour. Generally, the birds from the three zones appeared to be more homogeneous than heterogeneous in nature. However, further complementary work on genomics will guide future selection and breeding programs geared towards improving the productivity, survival and environmental adaptation of indigenous helmeted Guinea fowls in the tropics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Map of the three agro-ecological zones of study in Nigeria.
Fig 2
Fig 2. A biplot showing the relationship between the qualitative physical traits and agro-ecological zones.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Canonical discriminant function illustrating the distribution of the Guinea fowls among the agro-ecological zones.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Individual biometric traits, morphological indices and qualitative physical traits loadings on the principal components.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Association between the agro-ecologies and the phenotypic traits using CHAID.
Fig 6
Fig 6. The association between the agro-ecologies and the phenotypic traits using Exhaustive CHAID.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mushi JR, Chiwanga GH, Amuzu-Aweh EN, Walugembe M, Max RA, Lamont SJ, et al.. Phenotypic variability and population structure analysis of Tanzanian free-range local chickens. BMC Vet Res. 2020;16:360. 10.1186/s12917-020-02541-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murunga P, Kennedy GM, Imboma T, Malaki P, Kariuki D, Ndiema E, et al.. Mitochondrial DNA D-Loop diversity of the helmeted guinea fowls in Kenya and its implications on HSP70 Gene functional polymorphism. BioMed Res Int. 2018;7314038. 10.1155/2018/7314038 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teye GA, Gyawu PA. Guide to guinea fowl production in Ghana, 1–14. Tamale, Ghana: Muetpress, 2002.
    1. Vignal A, Boitard S, Thébault N, Dayo GK, Yapi-Gnaore V, Karim YA, et al.. A guinea fowl genome assembly provides new evidence on evolution following domestication and selection in Galliformes. Mol Ecol Res. 2019;19:997–1014. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Onunkwo DN, Okoro IC. Egg production performance of three varieties of guinea fowls in humid tropics. Int J Cur Res Rev. 2015;7:1–6.

Publication types