Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022:35:103068.
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103068. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

Event-related brain dynamics during mind wandering in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: An experience-sampling approach

Affiliations

Event-related brain dynamics during mind wandering in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: An experience-sampling approach

Natali Bozhilova et al. Neuroimage Clin. 2022.

Abstract

Adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) report increased spontaneous mind wandering (MW) compared to control adults. Since MW is associated with ADHD severity and functional impairment, elucidating the brain mechanisms underlying MW may inform new interventions targeting MW and point to neural markers to monitor their efficacy. Population-based electroencephalographic (EEG) studies suggest that weaker event-related decreases in occipital alpha power characterise periods of MW, but no study has examined event-related brain oscillations during MW in individuals with ADHD. Using an experience-sampling method, we compared adults with ADHD (N = 23) and controls (N = 25) on event-related EEG measures of power modulations and phase consistency during two tasks with high and low demands on working memory and sustained attention, and during periods of MW and task focus. Compared to controls, individuals with ADHD showed weaker alpha power decreases during high working memory demands and across sustained attention demands, weaker theta power increases and phase consistency across working memory demands and during low sustained attention demands, and weaker beta power decreases during low working memory demands. These EEG patterns suggest broadly deficient attentional and motor response processes in ADHD. During MW episodes, adults with ADHD showed weaker alpha power decreases in the sustained attention task and lower theta phase consistency in the working memory task compared to controls. These findings suggest that atypical EEG patterns thought to reflect reduced inhibition of task-irrelevant processes and inconsistent stimulus processing underlie increased MW in adults with ADHD and may be useful for future real-time monitoring of treatment effects.

Keywords: ADHD; Adult; Brain oscillations; EEG; Mind wandering; Sustained attention; Working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Professor Jonna Kuntsi has given talks at educational events sponsored by Medice: all funds are received by King’s College London and used for studies of ADHD. Professor Philip Asherson has received honoraria for consultancy to Shire/Takeda, Flynn-Pharma, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Lundbeck and Medice; educational/research awards from Janssen, Shire, Lilly, Novartis, Flynn Pharma, Vifor Pharma, GW Pharma and QbTech; speaker at sponsored events for Shire/Takeda, Lilly, Novartis, Medice, Janssen-Cilag and Flynn Pharma. Professor Katya Rubia has received a grant from Shire/Takeda for another project and consultancy fees from Lundbeck and Supernus pharmaceuticals which were received by King’s College London and used for studies of ADHD.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Event-related modulations during each task condition (0-back, 1-back) of the Mind Wandering Task (MWT) in the ADHD and control groups. Black boxes indicate significant group differences. The same scale limits are used across each time–frequency plot (A, B, C, D) and the corresponding topographic maps (E, F, G, H). A: Alpha (8–14 Hz) event-related perturbation (ERSP) at parieto-occipital regions. B: Beta (14–30 Hz) ERSP at centro-parietal regions. C: Theta (3–7 Hz) ERSP at fronto-central regions. D: Theta (3–7 Hz) inter-trial phase coherence (ITC) at fronto-central regions. E: Topographic maps for alpha ERSP in the 0–1000 ms window. F: Topographic maps for alpha ERSP in the 0–1000 ms window. G: Topographic maps for theta ERSP in the 0–500 ms window. H: Topographic maps for theta ITC in the 0–500 ms window.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Event-related modulations during each delay (1 s, 2 s, 5 s, 8 s) of the Sustained Attention Task (SAT) in the ADHD and control groups. Black boxes indicate significant group differences. The same scale limits are used across each time–frequency plot (A, B) and the corresponding topographic maps (C, D, E). A: Alpha (8–14 Hz) event-related perturbation (ERSP) at parieto-occipital regions. B: Theta (3–7 Hz) and beta (14–30 Hz) ERSP at centro-parietal regions. C: Topographic maps for alpha ERSP in the 0–1000 ms window. D: Topographic maps for theta ERSP in the 0–500 ms window. E: Topographic maps for beta ERSP in the 750–1500 ms window. Note: topographic maps are not shown for the 1 s delay condition as beta increase was not measured in this condition due to the shorter inter-stimulus interval.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Event-related modulations during task focus and mind wandering (MW) in the mind wandering task (MWT) in the ADHD and control groups. Black boxes indicate significant group differences. The same scale limits are used across each time–frequency plot (A, B, C) and the corresponding topographic maps (D, E, F). A: Alpha (8–14 Hz) event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) at occipital-parietal regions. B: Theta (3–7 Hz) ERSP at fronto-central regions. C: Theta (3–7 Hz) inter-trial phase coherence (ITC) at fronto-central regions. D: Topographic maps in the 0–1000 ms window for alpha ERSP. E: Topographic maps in the 0–500 ms window for theta ERSP. F: Topographic maps in the 0–500 ms window for theta ITC.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Event-related modulations during task focus and mind wandering (MW) in the sustained attention task (SAT) in the ADHD and control groups. The same scale limits are used across each time–frequency plot (A, B, C) and the corresponding topographic maps (D, E, F). A: Alpha (8–14 Hz) event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) at occipital-parietal regions. B: Theta (3–7 Hz) ERSP at fronto-central regions. C: Theta (3–7 Hz) inter-trial phase coherence (ITC) at fronto-central regions. D: Topographic maps in the 0–1000 ms window for alpha ERSP. E: Topographic maps in the 0–500 ms window for theta ERSP. F: Topographic maps in the 0–500 ms window for theta ITC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Association, A. P. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®): America Psychiatric Pub. - PubMed
    1. Arnau S., Löffler C., Rummel J., Hagemann D., Wascher E., Schubert A.L. Inter-trial alpha power indicates mind wandering. Psychophysiology. 2020;57(6):e13581. - PubMed
    1. Asherson P. Clinical assessment and treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2005;5(4):525–539. - PubMed
    1. Baird B., Smallwood J., Lutz A., Schooler J.W. The decoupled mind: mind- wandering disrupts cortical phase-locking to perceptual events. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2014;26(11):2596–2607. - PubMed
    1. Baldwin C.L., Roberts D.M., Barragan D., Lee J.D., Lerner N., Higgins J.S. Detecting and quantifying mind wandering during simulated driving. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017;11:406. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types