Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e063424.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063424.

PROcalcitonin and NEWS2 evaluation for Timely identification of sepsis and Optimal use of antibiotics in the emergency department (PRONTO): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations

PROcalcitonin and NEWS2 evaluation for Timely identification of sepsis and Optimal use of antibiotics in the emergency department (PRONTO): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Joanne Euden et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis is a common, potentially life-threatening complication of infection. The optimal treatment for sepsis includes prompt antibiotics and intravenous fluids, facilitated by its early and accurate recognition. Currently, clinicians identify and assess severity of suspected sepsis using validated clinical scoring systems. In England, the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) has been mandated across all National Health Service (NHS) trusts and ambulance organisations. Like many clinical scoring systems, NEWS2 should not be used without clinical judgement to determine either the level of acuity or a diagnosis. Despite this, there is a tendency to overemphasise the score in isolation in patients with suspected infection, leading to the overprescription of antibiotics and potentially treatment-related complications and rising antimicrobial resistance. The biomarker procalcitonin (PCT) has been shown to be useful in specific circumstances to support appropriate antibiotics prescribing by identifying bacterial infection. PCT is not routinely used in the care of undifferentiated patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs), and the evidence base of its optimal usage is poor. The PROcalcitonin and NEWS2 evaluation for Timely identification of sepsis and Optimal (PRONTO) study is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in adults with suspected sepsis presenting to the ED to compare standard clinical management based on NEWS2 scoring plus PCT-guided risk assessment with standard clinical management based on NEWS2 scoring alone and compare if this approach reduces prescriptions of antibiotics without increasing mortality.

Methods and analysis: PRONTO is a parallel two-arm open-label individually RCT set in up to 20 NHS EDs in the UK with a target sample size of 7676 participants. Participants will be randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to standard clinical management based on NEWS2 scoring or standard clinical management based on NEWS2 scoring plus PCT-guided risk assessment. We will compare whether the addition of PCT measurement to NEWS2 scoring can lead to a reduction in intravenous antibiotic initiation in ED patients managed as suspected sepsis, with at least no increase in 28-day mortality compared with NEWS2 scoring alone (in conjunction with local standard care pathways). PRONTO has two coprimary endpoints: initiation of intravenous antibiotics at 3 hours (superiority comparison) and 28-day mortality (non-inferiority comparison). The study has an internal pilot phase and group-sequential stopping rules for effectiveness and futility/safety, as well as a qualitative substudy and a health economic evaluation.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial protocol was approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA) and NHS Research Ethics Committee (Wales REC 2, reference 20/WA/0058). In England and Wales, the law allows the use of deferred consent in approved research situations (including ED studies) where the time dependent nature of intervention would not allow true informed consent to be obtained. PRONTO has approval for a deferred consent process to be used. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN54006056.

Keywords: accident & emergency medicine; adult intensive & critical care; infection control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: EC is co-CI for the BATCH Trial (HTA 15/188/42) and the PEACH study (HTA Project: NIHR132254) on PCT use, and member of NICE Diagnostic advisory committee (2014–2020), and NICE Sepsis guideline development committee (2014-6). All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial schema. ED, emergency department; NEWS, National Early Warning Score; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; PCT, procalcitonin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consent procedures. CRF, case report form; ED, emergency department; HCP, Health Care Professional; NEWS, National Early Warning Score; PRONTO, PROcalcitonin and NEWS2 evaluation for Timely identification of sepsis and Optimal use of antibiotics in the emergency department; RN, Research Nurse.

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. . The third International consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801–10. Online First: Epub Date. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NICE Sepsis Guide Development Group . Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management, NICE guideline [NG51]. Available: LastUpdate.www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng51
    1. Corfield AR, Lees F, Zealley I, et al. . Utility of a single early warning score in patients with sepsis in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2014;31:482–7. 10.1136/emermed-2012-202186 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burston J, Adhikari S, Hayen A, et al. . A role for antimicrobial stewardship in clinical sepsis pathways: a prospective interventional study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1032–8. 10.1017/ice.2017.139 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singer M, Inada-Kim M, Shankar-Hari M. Sepsis hysteria: excess hype and unrealistic expectations. Lancet 2019;394:1513–4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32483-3 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data