Concepts and metrics of clinician attention: a scoping review protocol
- PMID: 35697461
- PMCID: PMC9196160
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052334
Concepts and metrics of clinician attention: a scoping review protocol
Abstract
Introduction: There is growing emphasis on the importance of both the cognitive and behavioural phenomenon of attention for clinicians engaged in patient care. Aspects of attention such as cognitive load, distraction and task switching have been studied in various settings with different methodologies. Using the protocol described here, we aim to systematically review the medical literature in order to map the concept of attention and to synthesise diverse concepts and methods under the broader category of research focused on 'attention'.
Methods and analysis: Following the methodology described by the Joanna Briggs Institute and Arksey and O'Malley, our scoping review conducts an iterative search of Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline (PubMed) and EMBASE (Ovid). An initial limited search based on key concepts and terminology will generate relevant articles which in turn will be mined for additional keywords and index terms to guide a formal literature search. Our multidisciplinary team will extract data into a matrix, including a small random sample of the same studies (to ensure concordance), and present the results in a descriptive narrative format.
Ethics and dissemination: As a secondary analysis, our study does not require ethics approval, and we will ensure that included studies have appropriate approval. We anticipate results will identify diverse ways of conceptualising clinician attention and will provide a foundation for developing additional metrics and study methods to optimise attention in the clinical environment. We will disseminate results through journals and conferences and coordinate with colleagues doing work in adjacent fields.
Keywords: change management; health & safety; human resource management; organisation of health services; organisational development; quality in health care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare the following competing interests: MJK, KK, and MB received an honorarium from the New England Journal of Medicine for a related manuscript entitled ‘Toward a Medical Ecology of Attention’. AK receives 10% full time equivalents funded by the US Department of Defense for research entitled: ‘Sigh Ventilation to Reduce the Incidence and/or the Severity of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (SiVent)’ and received honoraria for reviewing Patient Centered Outcomes Research Translation Center research summaries.
References
-
- Newport C. Deep work: rules for focused success in a distracted world. New York: Grand Central Publishing, 2016: 304.
-
- Crawford MB. The world beyond your head: on becoming an individual in an age of distraction. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2015.
-
- Charon R. Narrative medicine: honoring the stories of illness. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials