Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 13;37(23):e180.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e180.

Immunogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: The Efficacy of a Mix-and-Match Strategy

Affiliations

Immunogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: The Efficacy of a Mix-and-Match Strategy

Joon-Sung Park et al. J Korean Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the immunogenicity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis.

Methods: ESRD patients at the hemodialysis center of a tertiary-care university-affiliated hospital and healthy employees at the clinical laboratory center were prospectively recruited between March and June 2021. For severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody analysis, blood samples were collected serially on days 0, 14, 28, and 56 after the first vaccine dose, and on days 7 and 50 after the second dose. Antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were quantified, and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies were measured in the serum and plasma.

Results: Thirty-one ESRD patients and 55 healthy employees were regularly monitored. Twenty-five (80.6%) ESRD patients on hemodialysis received a mix-and-match strategy with ChAdOx1-BNT162b2 (AZ-Pf group) and six (19.4%) received two doses of ChAdOx1 (AZ-AZ group). ESRD patients on hemodialysis showed lower binding antibody titers and neutralizing antibody activities compared to healthy participants following the first vaccination with ChAdOx1. After the second dose, AZ-Pf group had higher immunogenicity than healthy people on days 7 and 50. The binding antibody titer and neutralizing antibody activities on days 7 and 50 were significantly higher in the AZ-Pf group than in the AZ-AZ group.

Conclusion: ESRD patients on hemodialysis receiving the mix-and-match strategy (ChAdOx1-BNT162b2) have COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity comparable to healthy individuals receiving two doses of ChAdOx1.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871945.

Keywords: COVID-19; ESRD; Mix-and-Match; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Comparison of immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination between healthy people and patients with ESRD on hemodialysis.
(A) Binding antibody titer measured by Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S. (B) Neutralizing antibody activity measured by cPass™ SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit. (C) Neutralizing antibody activity measured by R-FIND SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody ELISA. (D) Proportion of participants with a positive result of binding antibody measured by Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S. (E) Proportion of participants with a positive result of neutralizing antibody measured by cPass™ SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit. (F) Proportion of participants with a positive result of neutralizing antibody measured by R-FIND SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody ELISA. COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, ESRD = end-stage renal disease, SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, E = patients with ESRD, H = healthy people. aP values are the result of Mann–Whitney U test; bP values are the result of Wilcoxon signed-rank test; and cP values are the result of the Cochrane–Armitage test for trend.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Comparison of immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination between patients with ESRD on hemodialysis who received ChAdOx1–BNT162b2 and those who received two doses of ChAdOx1.
(A) Binding antibody titer measured by Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S. (B) Neutralizing antibody activity measured by cPass™ SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit. (C) Neutralizing antibody activity measured by R-FIND SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody ELISA. (D) Change in the level of binding antibody between day 56 from the first dose and day 7 from the second dose measured by Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S. (E) Change in the level of neutralizing antibody between day 56 from the first dose and day 7 from the second dose measured by cPass™ SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit. (F) Change in the level of neutralizing antibody between day 56 from the first dose and day 7 from the second dose measured by R-FIND SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody ELISA. COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, ESRD = end-stage renal disease, SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Vec = ChAdOx1, mRNA = BNT162b2, E = patients with ESRD, H = healthy people. aP values are the result of Mann–Whitney U test.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination.
(A) Comparison between healthy people and patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. (B) Comparison between patients with ESRD on hemodialysis who received ChAdOx1–BNT162b2 and those who received two doses of ChAdOx1. COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, ESRD = end-stage renal disease. aP value <0.05.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Cumulative incidence function curves of COVID-19 vaccination humoral immunogenicity stratified by (A) patient with GN as underlying cause of hemodialysis, (B) steroid treatment, (C) Corr Ca, and (D) CRP.
COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, GN = glomerulonephritis, Adj HR = adjuster hazard ratio, CI = confidential interval, Corr Ca = corrected serum calcium, CRP = C-reactive protein. aAdjusted for age and sex; bEvaluate hypotheses of equality of cause-specific cumulative incidence functions between two groups; cDefined as a SARS-CoV-2 nAbs ≥ 30% inhibition at each specific time points.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507–513. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603–2615. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dagan N, Barda N, Kepten E, Miron O, Perchik S, Katz MA, et al. BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(15):1412–1423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brosh-Nissimov T, Orenbuch-Harroch E, Chowers M, Elbaz M, Nesher L, Stein M, et al. BNT162b2 vaccine breakthrough: clinical characteristics of 152 fully vaccinated hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Israel. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(11):1652–1657. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kamar N, Abravanel F, Marion O, Couat C, Izopet J, Del Bello A. Three doses of an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in solid-organ transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(7):661–662. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data