Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 1;128 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):2649-2658.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33944.

Development of a workflow process mapping protocol to inform the implementation of regional patient navigation programs in breast oncology

Collaborators, Affiliations

Development of a workflow process mapping protocol to inform the implementation of regional patient navigation programs in breast oncology

Nicole L Casanova et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Implementing city-wide patient navigation processes that support patients across the continuum of cancer care is impeded by a lack of standardized tools to integrate workflows and reduce gaps in care. The authors present an actionable workflow process mapping protocol for navigation process planning and improvement based on methods developed for the Translating Research Into Practice study.

Methods: Key stakeholders at each study site were identified through existing community partnerships, and data on each site's navigation processes were collected using mixed methods through a series of team meetings. The authors used Health Quality Ontario's Quality Improvement Guide, service design principles, and key stakeholder input to map the collected data onto a template structured according to the case-management model.

Results: Data collection and process mapping exercises resulted in a 10-step protocol that includes: 1) workflow mapping procedures to guide data collection on the series of activities performed by health care personnel that comprise a patient's navigation experience, 2) a site survey to assess program characteristics, 3) a semistructured interview guide to assess care coordination workflows, 4) a site-level swim lane workflow process mapping template, and 5) a regional high-level process mapping template to aggregate data from multiple site-level process maps.

Conclusions: This iterative, participatory approach to data collection and process mapping can be used by improvement teams to streamline care coordination, ultimately improving the design and delivery of an evidence-based navigation model that spans multiple treatment modalities and multiple health systems in a metropolitan area. This protocol is presented as an actionable toolkit so the work may be replicated to support other quality-improvement initiatives and efforts to design truly patient-centered breast cancer treatment experiences.

Lay summary: Evidence-based patient navigation in breast cancer care requires the integration of services through each phase of cancer treatment. The Translating Research Into Practice study aims to implement patient navigation for patients with breast cancer who are at risk for delays and are seeking care across 6 health systems in Boston, Massachusetts. The authors designed a 10-step protocol outlining procedures and tools that support a systematic assessment for health systems that want to implement breast cancer patient navigation services for patients who are at risk for treatment delays.

Keywords: breast cancer; health equity; implementation science; patient navigation; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

COI: We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Overview of the workflow mapping process
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Template of the patient navigation swimlane workflow process map, by oncology department Caption: This template displays an example of a site in which navigation activities are only offered in radiology and surgical oncology. While there is a “warm handoff” from radiology to surgical oncology, there are no personnel responsible for navigation to receive patients in either medical oncology or radiation oncology. This visualization illustrates a need to identify personnel in these two departments who can perform navigation activities and support multi-disciplinary care coordination throughout a patient’s treatment experience.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Template of the Regional Patient Navigation High-Level Process Map, by site

References

    1. Ko NY, Snyder FR, Raich PC, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in patient navigation: Results from the Patient Navigation Research Program. Cancer. 2016;122(17):2715–2722. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Society ON, Work AoOS, Workers NAoS. Oncology Nursing Society, the Association of Oncology Social Work, and the National Association of Social Workers joint position on the role of oncology nursing and oncology social work in patient navigation. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(3):251–252. - PubMed
    1. Freeman HP, Rodriguez RL. History and principles of patient navigation. Cancer. 2011;117(15 Suppl):3539–3542. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cancer Co. Cancer Program Standards: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons;2015.
    1. Strusowski T, Shoemaker M. Oncology Disease-Site Process Mapping: Coordinating Care across the Continuum. Oncology Issues. 2017;32(6):52–56. doi:10.1080/10463356.2017.11905304 - DOI

Publication types