Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;70(2):329-349.
doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01662-3. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

Ecological Sustainability Assessment of Water Distribution for the Maintenance of Ecosystems, their Services and Biodiversity

Affiliations

Ecological Sustainability Assessment of Water Distribution for the Maintenance of Ecosystems, their Services and Biodiversity

Anna Schlattmann et al. Environ Manage. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Water provision and distribution are subject to conflicts between users worldwide, with agriculture as a major driver of discords. Water sensitive ecosystems and their services are often impaired by man-made water shortage. Nevertheless, they are not sufficiently included in sustainability or risk assessments and neglected when it comes to distribution of available water resources. The herein presented contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals Clean Water and Sanitation (SDG 6) and Life on Land (SDG 15) is the Ecological Sustainability Assessment of Water distribution (ESAW-tool). The ESAW-tool introduces a watershed sustainability assessment that evaluates the sustainability of the water supply-demand ratio on basin level, where domestic water use and the water requirements of ecosystems are considered as most important water users. An ecological risk assessment estimates potential impacts of agricultural depletion of renewable water resources on (ground)water-dependent ecosystems. The ESAW-tool works in standard GIS applications and is applicable in basins worldwide with a set of broadly available input data. The ESAW-tool is tested in the Danube river basin through combination of high-resolution hydro-agroecological model data (hydrological land surface process model PROMET and groundwater model OpenGeoSys) and further freely available data (water use, biodiversity and wetlands maps). Based on the results, measures for more sustainable water management can be deduced, such as increase of rainfed agriculture near vulnerable ecosystems or change of certain crops. The tool can support decision making of authorities from local to national level as well as private enterprises who want to improve the sustainability of their supply chains.

Keywords: Biodiversity; Ecosystem Services; GIS; SDGs; Sustainability assessment; Water distribution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workflow of the development and application of the multiscale ESAW-tool including the main data inputs, processes, outcomes, and user applications
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Location of the Danube river basin in Europe and riparian states of the Danube basin (Based on: ESRI World terrain Base; TM_WORLD_BORDERS-0.1, Lehner and Grill 2013)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
WSI results for the sub-basins of the Danube basin from April to September 2015. Green and yellow indicate sustainable index values, orange and red indicate unsustainable index values
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Summary of four-year period (2015–2018) for the WSI. Map shows all sub-basins that have an unsustainable water use for at least three months in each of the four vegetation periods
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
WDI results for the vegetation period 2015 in the Danube basin. Green and yellow indicate sustainable index values, orange, red and purple indicate unsustainable index values
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Results for compliance with e-flows from April to September 2015 the Danube basin. Green and yellow indicate compliance with e-flows, orange and red indicate no compliance with e-flows
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Risk of agricultural water use to impair GDEs in the Danube basin. Overview and detailed view with intersection with ecosystem map
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Hot Spots of unsustainable water use in July 2015–2018 in the Danube basin. Overview on the entire Danube basin and detailed view on a sub-basin overlaid with the WSI result for the respective month. The detail view shows that large areas of the sub-basin are Hot Spots of unsustainable water use

References

    1. Albert C, Galler C, Hermes J, Neuendorf F, von Haaren C, Lovett A. Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management, The ES-in-Planning framework. Ecol Indic. 2016;61:100–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.029. - DOI
    1. Beaumont P. The 1997 UN Convention on the Law of Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses: Its Strengths and Weaknesses from a Water Management Perspective and the Need for New Workable Guidelines. Int J Water Resour Dev. 2000;16:475–495. doi: 10.1080/713672536. - DOI
    1. Bell S, Driscoll C (2006) Vegetation of the Tomago and Tomaree Sandbeds. Port Stephens, New South Wales, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274329074_Vegetation_of_the_Tom.... Accessed 05 Nov 2020
    1. BfN (2006) Wasserrahmenrichtlinie, wasserabhängige Lebensraumtypen nach Anhang I der FFH-Richtlinie. https://www.bfn.de/themen/natura-2000/management/kooperation-mit-nutzern.... Accessed 11 Nov 2020
    1. BGR (2019) Extended vector data of the International Hydrological Map of Europe 1:1,500,000 (Version IHME 1500 v1.2). https://www.bgr.bund.de/ihme1500. Accessed 10 Nov 2020

LinkOut - more resources