Toward a Clearer Definition of Selection Bias When Estimating Causal Effects
- PMID: 35700187
- PMCID: PMC9378569
- DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001516
Toward a Clearer Definition of Selection Bias When Estimating Causal Effects
Abstract
Selection bias remains a subject of controversy. Existing definitions of selection bias are ambiguous. To improve communication and the conduct of epidemiologic research focused on estimating causal effects, we propose to unify the various existing definitions of selection bias in the literature by considering any bias away from the true causal effect in the referent population (the population before the selection process), due to selecting the sample from the referent population, as selection bias. Given this unified definition, selection bias can be further categorized into two broad types: type 1 selection bias owing to restricting to one or more level(s) of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) and type 2 selection bias owing to restricting to one or more level(s) of an effect measure modifier. To aid in explaining these two types-which can co-occur-we start by reviewing the concepts of the target population, the study sample, and the analytic sample. Then, we illustrate both types of selection bias using causal diagrams. In addition, we explore the differences between these two types of selection bias, and describe methods to minimize selection bias. Finally, we use an example of "M-bias" to demonstrate the advantage of classifying selection bias into these two types.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias.Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Feb 5;193(3):407-409. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad213. Am J Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 37939152 Free PMC article.
-
Invited Commentary: Selection Bias Without Colliders.Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;185(11):1048-1050. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx077. Am J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28535177 Free PMC article.
-
Reflection on modern methods: selection bias-a review of recent developments.Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;47(5):1714-1722. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy138. Int J Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29982600
-
Where to look for the most frequent biases?Nephrology (Carlton). 2020 Jun;25(6):435-441. doi: 10.1111/nep.13706. Epub 2020 Mar 27. Nephrology (Carlton). 2020. PMID: 32133725 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Avoiding selection bias in metabolomics studies: a tutorial.Metabolomics. 2019 Jan 3;15(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s11306-018-1463-4. Metabolomics. 2019. PMID: 30830435 Review.
Cited by
-
Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias.Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Feb 5;193(3):407-409. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad213. Am J Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 37939152 Free PMC article.
-
Association between seropositivity for toxocariasis and cognitive functioning in older adults: an analysis of cross-sectional data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2011-2014.BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):e068974. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068974. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 36858467 Free PMC article.
-
Interpreting Randomized Controlled Trials.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;15(19):4674. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194674. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37835368 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mixtures of Metals and Micronutrients in Early Pregnancy and Cognition in Early and Mid-Childhood: Findings from the Project Viva Cohort.Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Aug;131(8):87008. doi: 10.1289/EHP12016. Epub 2023 Aug 16. Environ Health Perspect. 2023. PMID: 37585348 Free PMC article.
-
Simple graphical rules for assessing selection bias in general-population and selected-sample treatment effects.Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 8;194(1):267-277. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae145. Am J Epidemiol. 2025. PMID: 38904459 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources