Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;99(3):167-172.
doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-055381. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis and bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among gay and bisexual men

Affiliations

Pre-exposure prophylaxis and bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among gay and bisexual men

Trevor A Hart et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2023 May.

Abstract

Objectives: While pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prevents HIV acquisition among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM), PrEP-using GBM may be more likely to engage in sexual behaviours associated with bacterial STIs. We examined associations between PrEP use, condomless anal sex (CAS), number of anal sex partners, oral sex and bacterial STI diagnoses among GBM living in Canada's three largest cities.

Methods: Among HIV-negative/unknown-status GBM in the baseline of the Engage cohort study, we fit a structural equation model of the associations between any PrEP use, sexual behaviours and bacterial STI diagnosis. We estimated direct and indirect paths between PrEP use and STI via CAS, number of anal sex partners and oral sex.

Results: The sample included 2007 HIV-negative/unknown status GBM in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. There was a significant direct association between PrEP use and current STI diagnosis (β=0.181; 95% CI: 0.112 to 0.247; p<0.001), CAS (β=0.275; 95% CI: 0.189 to 0.361; p<0.001) and number of anal sex partners (β=0.193; 95% CI: 0.161 to 0.225; p<0.001). In the mediated model, the direct association between PrEP use and STIs was non-significant. However, the indirect paths from PrEP to CAS to STIs (β=0.064; 95% CI: 0.025 to 0.120; p=0.008), and from PrEP to greater number of anal sex partners to CAS to STIs were significant (β=0.059; 95% CI: 0.024 to 0.108; p=0.007).

Conclusions: Our study adds to the growing awareness that PrEP use among GBM may be associated with bacterial STIs because PrEP users have more anal sex partners and are more likely to engage in CAS. The results underscore the importance of providing effective STI counselling and regular testing to PrEP users, adapting PrEP care and related STI testing to individual needs, and the need for effective prevention strategies for bacterial STIs.

Keywords: Bacterial Infections; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; SEXUAL HEALTH; Sexual Behavior; Sexual and Gender Minorities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JC, HA, Marc Messier-Peet and GL report non-financial support from the Direction régionale de santé publique, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux Centre-Sud-de-l’Ile-de-Montréal. JC reports grants and personal fees from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences Canada, and personal fees from Merck Canada, outside the submitted work. DM reports a grant from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. NJL reports grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, Canadian Blood Services, the Vancouver Island Health Authority, the Canadian Foundation for AIDS Research, Gilead Sciences Canada, the Vancouver Foundation, the Public Health Agency of Canada, the University of Victoria and Mitacs, outside the submitted work. DT reports a grant from the Canada Research Chairs Program; and grants from AbbVie and Gilead Sciences, outside the submitted work. He has been a site principal investigator for clinical trials sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Cecile Tremblay reports grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck and ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Associations between pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use with any recent bacterial STI diagnosis via condomless anal sex (CAS), oral sex (OS) and number of anal sex partners (NSPs). This structural equation model presents associations between PrEP use and bacterial STIs, with intermediary associations of CAS, OS and NSPs. Dotted lines represent non-significant associations; bold lines represent significant indirect paths. β: standardised coefficient; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haddad N, Robert A, Weeks A, et al. . HIV in Canada—surveillance report, 2018. Can Commun Dis Rep 2019;45:304–12. 10.14745/ccdr.v45i12a01 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hull M, Tan DHS. Setting the stage for expanding HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use in Canada. Can Commun Dis Rep 2017;43:272–8. 10.14745/ccdr.v43i12a05 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen Y-H, Guigayoma J, McFarland W, et al. . Increases in pre-exposure prophylaxis use and decreases in condom use: behavioral patterns among HIV-negative San Francisco men who have sex with men, 2004–2017. AIDS Behav 2019;23:1841–5. 10.1007/s10461-018-2299-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holt M, Lea T, Kippax S, et al. . Awareness and knowledge of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among Australian gay and bisexual men: results of a national, online survey. Sex Health 2016;13:359. 10.1071/SH15243 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mayer KH, Chan PA, R. Patel R, et al. . Evolving models and ongoing challenges for HIV preexposure prophylaxis implementation in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018;77:119–27. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001579 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms