Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2022 Aug;49(8):740-748.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13672. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

Comparison of the efficacy of periodontal prognostic systems in predicting tooth loss

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of the efficacy of periodontal prognostic systems in predicting tooth loss

Selai Saydzai et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this analysis was to assess how different tooth-prognosis systems could predict tooth loss in a cohort of periodontitis patients followed up prospectively during supportive periodontal care (SPC).

Materials and methods: Clinical and radiographic data of 97 patients undergoing regular SPC for 5 years were used to assign tooth prognosis using four different systems (McGuire & Nunn, 1996; Kwok & Caton, 2007; Graetz et al., 2011; Nibali et al., 2017). Three independent examiners assigned tooth prognosis using all four systems, following a calibration exercise. The association between prognostic categories and tooth loss was tested for each prognostic system separately and across prognostic systems.

Results: All four systems showed good reproducibility and could identify teeth at higher risk of being lost during 5 years of SPC; the risk of tooth loss increased with the worsening of tooth-prognosis category (p < .0001). Although specificity and negative predictive values were good, low sensitivity and positive predictive values were detected for all systems.

Conclusions: Previously published periodontal prognostic systems exhibited good reproducibility and predictive ability for tooth retention. However, low sensitivity was detected, with several teeth in the worst prognosis category being retained at 5 years. Some modifications in the number of categories and their definitions are suggested.

Keywords: periodontitis; prognosis; tooth loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ainamo, J. , & Bay, I. (1975). Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. International Dental Journal, 25, 229–235. - PubMed
    1. Avila G., Galindo‐Moreno P., Soehren S., Misch C. E., Morelli T., & Wang H. L. (2009). A novel decision‐making process for tooth retention or extraction. J Periodontol, 80(3), 476–491. 10.1902/jop.2009.080454. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chambrone, L. , Chambrone, D. , Lima, L. A. , & Chambrone, L. A. (2010). Predictors of tooth loss during long‐term periodontal maintenance: A systematic review of observational studies. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 37, 675–684. - PubMed
    1. Claffey, N. , & Egelberg, J. (1995). Clinical indicators of probing attachment loss following initial periodontal treatment in advanced periodontitis patients. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 22, 690–696. - PubMed
    1. Costa, F. O. , Cota, L. O. , Lages, E. J. , Lima Oliveira, A. P. , Cortelli, S. C. , Cortelli, J. R. , Lorentz, T. C. , & Costa, J. E. (2012). Periodontal risk assessment model in a sample of regular and irregular compliers under maintenance therapy: A 3‐year prospective study. Journal of Periodontology, 83, 292–300. - PubMed

Publication types