Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;18(6):20220118.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0118. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

Giant gar from directly above the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary suggests healthy freshwater ecosystems existed within thousands of years of the asteroid impact

Affiliations

Giant gar from directly above the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary suggests healthy freshwater ecosystems existed within thousands of years of the asteroid impact

Chase Doran Brownstein et al. Biol Lett. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

The Cretaceous-Palaeogene (K-Pg) mass extinction was responsible for the destruction of global ecosystems and loss of approximately three-quarters of species diversity 66 million years ago. Large-bodied land vertebrates suffered high extinction rates, whereas small-bodied vertebrates living in freshwater ecosystems were buffered from the worst effects. Here, we report a new species of large-bodied (1.4-1.5 m) gar based on a complete skeleton from the Williston Basin of North America. The new species was recovered 18 cm above the K-Pg boundary, making it one of the oldest articulated vertebrate fossils from the Cenozoic. The presence of this freshwater macropredator approximately 1.5-2.5 thousand years after the asteroid impact suggests the rapid recovery and reassembly of North American freshwater food webs and ecosystems after the mass extinction.

Keywords: Fish; K–Pg; Lepisosteidae; Lilliput effect; gar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Anatomy of †Atractosteus grandei sp. nov. Skull in (a) dorsal, (b) ventral and (c) lateral views. Inset shows size compared to a 1.85 m tall man.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Size and phylogenetic relationships of †Atractosteus grandei sp. nov. (a) Linear regression of HL against SL in a sample of gars, with red star indicating the position on the regression length corresponding to the length of the skull of †A. grandei sp. nov. (b) Time-calibrated maximum clade credibility tree from analysis of the morphological matrix in BEAST 2.6.6. Red line denotes the position of the K–Pg boundary/recovery period. Ma = millions of years.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. O'Leary MA, et al. 2013. The placental mammal ancestor and the post-K–Pg radiation of placentals. Science 339, 662-667. (10.1126/science.1229237) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hull P. 2015. Life in the aftermath of mass extinctions. Curr. Biol. 25, R941-R952. (10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.053) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raup DM, Sepkoski JJ Jr. 1982. Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science 215, 1501-1503. (10.1126/science.215.4539.1501) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jablonski D, Raup DM. 1995. Selectivity of end-Cretaceous marine bivalve extinctions. Science 268, 389-391. (10.1126/science.11536722) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jablonski D. 2005. Mass extinctions and macroevolution. Paleobiology 31, 192-210. (10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031[0192:MEAM]2.0.CO;2) - DOI

LinkOut - more resources