Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):20-21.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005485. Epub 2022 May 12.

Editorial on Toesca et al's "A Randomized Trial of Robotic Mastectomy Versus Open Surgery in Women With Breast Cancer or BRCA Mutation"

Kelly K Hunt  1
Affiliations
Editorial

Editorial on Toesca et al's "A Randomized Trial of Robotic Mastectomy Versus Open Surgery in Women With Breast Cancer or BRCA Mutation"

Kelly K Hunt. Ann Surg. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interests.

Comment on

References

    1. Toesca A, Sangalli C, Maisonneuve P, et al. A randomized trial of robotic mastectomy versus open surgery in women with breast cancer or BrCA mutation. Ann Surg 2022; 276:11–19.
    1. Lemaine V, Hoskin TL, Farley DR, et al. Introducing the SKIN Score: a validated scoring system to assess severity of mastectomy skin flap necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:2925–2932.
    1. Wong SW, Ang ZH, Yang PF, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics. J Robot Surg 2022; 16:241–246.
    1. Endara M, Chen D, Verma K, et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132:1043–1054.
    1. De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, et al. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:3241–3249.