Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 1;90(S1):S32-S40.
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002963.

Data Velocity in HIV-Related Implementation Research: Estimating Time From Funding to Publication

Affiliations
Review

Data Velocity in HIV-Related Implementation Research: Estimating Time From Funding to Publication

Sheree R Schwartz et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. .

Abstract

Background: Given available effective biomedical and behavioral prevention and treatment interventions, HIV-related implementation research (IR) is expanding. The rapid generation and dissemination of IR to inform guidelines and practice has the potential to optimize the impact of the Ending the Epidemic Initiative and the HIV pandemic response more broadly.

Methods: We leveraged a prior mapping review of NIH-funded awards in HIV and IR from January 2013 to March 2018 and identified all publications linked to those grants in NIH RePORTER through January 1, 2021 (n = 1509). Deduplication and screening of nonoriginal research reduced the count to 1032 articles, of which 952 were eligible and included in this review. Publication volume and timing were summarized; Kaplan-Meier plots estimated time to publication.

Results: Among the 215 NIH-funded IR-related awards, 127 of 215 (59%) published original research directly related to the grant, averaging 2.0 articles (SD: 3.3) per award, largely in the early IR phases. Many articles (521 of 952, 55%) attributed to grants did not report grant-related data. Time from article submission to publication averaged 205 days (SD: 107). The median time-to-first publication from funding start was 4 years. Data dissemination velocity varied by award type, trending toward faster publication in recent years. Delays in data velocity included (1) time from funding to enrollment, (2) enrollment length, and (3) time from data collection completion to publication.

Conclusion: Research publication was high overall, and time-to-publication is accelerating; however, over 40% of grants have yet to publish findings from grant-related data. Addressing bottlenecks in the production and dissemination of HIV-related IR would reinforce its programmatic and policy relevance in the HIV response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

E.G. has received non–drug-related funding from ViiV healthcare. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
PRISMA Diagram of NIH Funded HIV-related Implementation Research Grants and Published Articles included in the Data Velocity Analysis
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Schematic of steps across the research production and dissemination cascade.
Steps in blue show the average number of years (mean, standard deviation and number of papers included) for each research step from the 431 publications included in the review. Denominators vary based on reporting in papers and by journals. Data collection dates that precede study awards were excluded within the step. Thus, the overall mean years from award data to publication for grant-related original research articles in green includes all 431 articles and represents a shorter period, given that data collection included within the articles often preceded study award dates. Studies that did not publish one or more original research papers are excluded from this figure.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Time from grant award to publication of first, third and fifth original research publications directly related to the award in years, overall and excluding K-awards
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Time from grant award to first grant-related publication in years, stratified by (a) Year of funding, excluding 2018 due to small sample size; (b) Study region; (c) Grant mechanism; (d) Implementation Research (IR) Continuum at grant level

References

    1. Smith JD, Li DH, Hirschhorn LR, et al. Landscape of HIV Implementation Research Funded by the National Institutes of Health: A Mapping Review of Project Abstracts. AIDS and behavior. 2020;24(6):1903–1911. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baral S, Rao A, Sullivan P, et al. The disconnect between individual-level and population-level HIV prevention benefits of antiretroviral treatment. The lancet HIV. 2019. - PubMed
    1. Geng EH, Holmes CB, Moshabela M, Sikazwe I, Petersen ML. Personalized public health: An implementation research agenda for the HIV response and beyond. PLoS medicine. 2020;16(12):e1003020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bain LE, Nkoke C, Noubiap JJN. UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets to end the AIDS epidemic by 2020 are not realistic: comment on “Can the UNAIDS 90-90-90 target be achieved? A systematic analysis of national HIV treatment cascades”. BMJ global health. 2017;2(2):e000227–e000227. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox J, Gutner C, Kronfli N, et al. A need for implementation science to optimise the use of evidence-based interventions in HIV care: A systematic literature review. PloS one. 2019;14(8):e0220060. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types