Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 1;234(6):1137-1146.
doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000187. Epub 2022 May 11.

Does Adding a Measure of Social Vulnerability to a Surgical Risk Calculator Improve Its Performance?

Adam R Dyas  1 , Heather Carmichael  1 , Michael R Bronsert  1   2 , William G Henderson  1   2   3 , Helen J Madsen  1 , Kathryn L Colborn  3 , Catherine G Velopulos  1 , Robert A Meguid  1   2
Affiliations

Does Adding a Measure of Social Vulnerability to a Surgical Risk Calculator Improve Its Performance?

Adam R Dyas et al. J Am Coll Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Emerging literature suggests that measures of social vulnerability should be incorporated into surgical risk calculators. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) is a measure designed by the CDC that encompasses 15 socioeconomic and demographic variables at the census tract level. We examined whether adding the SVI into a parsimonious surgical risk calculator would improve model performance.

Study design: The eight-variable Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS), developed using the entire American College of Surgeons (ACS) NSQIP database, was applied to local ACS-NSQIP data from 2012 to 2018 to predict 12 postoperative outcomes. Patient addresses were geocoded and used to estimate the SVI, which was then added to the model as a ninth predictor variable. Brier scores and c-indices were compared for the models with and without the SVI.

Results: The analysis included 31,222 patients from five hospitals. Brier scores were identical for eight outcomes and improved by only one to two points in the fourth decimal place for four outcomes with addition of the SVI. Similarly, c-indices were not significantly different (p values ranged from 0.15 to 0.96). Of note, the SVI was associated with most of the eight SURPAS predictor variables, suggesting that SURPAS may already indirectly capture this important risk factor.

Conclusion: The eight-variable SURPAS prediction model was not significantly improved by adding the SVI, showing that this parsimonious tool functions well without including a measure of social vulnerability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. The Economic Innovation Group. The 2016 Distressed Communities Index: An Analysis of Community Well-Being Across the United States. Available at: https://eig.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2016-Distressed-Communities-I... . Accessed June 4, 2021
    1. Singh GK. Area deprivation and widening inequalities in US mortality, 1969-1998. Am J Public Health 2003;93, 1137–1143.
    1. Hawkins RB, Mehaffey JH, Charles EJ, et al. Socioeconomically Distressed Communities Index independently predicts major adverse limb events after infrainguinal bypass in a national cohort. J Vasc Surg 2019, 70:1985–1993 e8.
    1. Charles EJ, Mehaffey JH, Hawkins RB, et al. Investigators for the Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative. Socioeconomic Distressed Communities Index predicts risk-adjusted mortality after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;107:1706–1712.
    1. Madhav KC, Oral E, Straif-Bourgeois S, et al. The effect of area deprivation on COVID-19 risk in Louisiana. PLoS One 2020;15:e0243028.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources