Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2022 Nov 14;114(11):1555-1556.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac111.

Response to Moskowitz and Birnbaum, Taylor, Baldwin, et al

Joachim Schüz  1 , Kirstin Pirie  2 , Gillian K Reeves  2 , Sarah Floud  2 , Valerie Beral  2
Affiliations
Comment

Response to Moskowitz and Birnbaum, Taylor, Baldwin, et al

Joachim Schüz et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Moskowitz JM. RE: Cellular telephone use and the risk of brain tumors: update of the UK Million Women Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(11):1549--1550. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vrijheid M, Armstrong BK, Bédard D, et al. Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2009;19(4):369-381. doi: 10.1038/jes.2008.27. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baan R, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, et al. ; WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):624-626. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70147-4. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(8):e379. - PubMed
    1. Toledano MB, Auvinen A, Tettamanti G, et al. An international prospective cohort study of mobile phone users and health (COSMOS): factors affecting validity of self-reported mobile phone use. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.09.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. INTERPHONE Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(3):675-694. doi:10.1093/ije/dyq079. Erratum in: Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(1):328. - PubMed