Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;91(9):1842-1854.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13762. Epub 2022 Jun 26.

Interaction fidelity is less common than expected in plant-pollinator communities

Affiliations

Interaction fidelity is less common than expected in plant-pollinator communities

Santiago A Parra et al. J Anim Ecol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Pairs of plants and pollinators species sometimes consistently interact throughout time and across space. Such consistency can be interpreted as a sign of interaction fidelity, that is a consistent interaction between two species when they co-occur in the same place. But how common interaction fidelity is and what determines interaction fidelity in plant-pollinator communities remain open questions. We aim to assess how frequent is interaction fidelity between plants and their pollinators and what drives interaction fidelity across plant-pollinator communities. Using a dataset of 141 networks around the world, we quantify whether the interaction between pairs of plant and pollinator species happens more ('interaction fidelity') or less ('interaction avoidance') often than expected by chance given the structure of the networks in which they co-occur. We also explore the relationship between interaction fidelity and species' degree (i.e. number of interactions), and the taxonomy of the species involved in the interaction. Our findings reveal that most plant-pollinator interactions do not differ from random expectations, in other words show neither fidelity nor avoidance. Out of the total 44,814 co-occurring species pairs we found 7,877 unique pair interactions (18%). Only 551 (7%) of the 7,877 plant-pollinator interactions did show significant interaction fidelity, meaning that these pairs interact in a consistent and non-random way across networks. We also find that 39 (0.09%) out of 44,814 plant-pollinator pairs showed significant interaction avoidance. Our results suggest that interactions involving specialist species have a high probability to show interaction fidelity and a low probability of interaction avoidance. In addition, we find that particular associations between plant and insect orders, as for example interactions between Hymenoptera and Fabales, showed high fidelity and low avoidance. Although niche and neutral processes simultaneously influence patterns of interaction in ecological communities, our findings suggest that it is rather neutral processes that are shaping the patterns of interactions in plant-pollinator networks.

Keywords: co-occurrence; coevolution; community ecology; interaction turnover; mutualistic interactions; pollination networks; specialization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aizen, M. A., Sabatino, M., & Tylianakis, J. M. (2012). Specialization and rarity predict nonrandom loss of interactions from mutualist networks. Science, 335, 1486-1489. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215320
    1. Bascompte, J., García, M. B., Ortega, R., Rezende, E. L., & Pironon, S. (2019). Mutualistic interactions reshuffle the effects of climate change on plants across the tree of life. Science Advances, 5, eaav2539. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav2539
    1. Benadi, G., Hovestadt, T., Poethke, H. J., & Blüthgen, N. (2014). Specialization and phenological synchrony of plant-pollinator interactions along an altitudinal gradient. Journal of Animal Ecology, 83, 639-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12158
    1. Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F., & Blüthgen, N. (2006). Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology, 6, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
    1. Bring, J. (1994). How to standardize regression coefficients. The American Statistician, 48, 209-213.

LinkOut - more resources