Oral brush biopsy using liquid-based cytology is a reliable tool for oral cancer screening: A cost-utility analysis: Oral brush biopsy for oral cancer screening
- PMID: 35704619
- PMCID: PMC9544877
- DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22599
Oral brush biopsy using liquid-based cytology is a reliable tool for oral cancer screening: A cost-utility analysis: Oral brush biopsy for oral cancer screening
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility and associated cost of oral liquid-based brush cytology (OLBC) in the diagnosis of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs).
Methods: A total of 284 patients with oral mucosal lesions were included. OLBC samples were collected from all patients immediately before undergoing surgical biopsies. A liquid-based cytology slide was prepared from each OLBC sample for cytological evaluation using the modified 2014 Bethesda cytology system. The results and the cost were compared with the histopathological outcomes.
Results: The level of agreement between the two approaches was very good (weighted kappa = 0.824). The accuracy of OLBC in differentiating between the different diagnostic groups was 91.69%, whereas the associated sensitivity and specificity were 79.23% and 94.81%, respectively. The estimated cost of each OLBC sample was at least 26% less than the cost of a single biopsy and more than 42% less in cases of multiple biopsied lesions.
Conclusions: The proposed modifications of the Bethesda system can be adopted as a standardized system for oral cytological assessment. Our findings support OLBC as a reliable adjunct to surgical biopsy in the diagnosis of OPMDs. This tool has potential for oral cancer-finding and surveillance programs.
Keywords: brush biopsy; cost analysis; oral liquid-based brush cytology; oral potentially malignant disorders.
© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Cytopathology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The author made no disclosures.
Figures
References
-
- Warnakulasuriya S, Kujan O, Aguirre‐Urizar JM, et al. Oral potentially malignant disorders: a consensus report from an international seminar on nomenclature and classification, convened by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Cancer. Oral Dis. 2020;27(8):1862–1880. - PubMed
-
- Iocca O, Sollecito TP, Alawi F, et al. Potentially malignant disorders of the oral cavity and oral dysplasia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of malignant transformation rate by subtype. Head Neck. 2019;42(3):539–555. - PubMed
-
- Idrees M, Kujan O, Shearston K, Farah CS. Oral lichen planus has a very low malignant transformation rate: a systematic review and meta‐analysis using strict diagnostic and inclusion criteria. J Oral Pathol Med. 2020;50(3):287–298. - PubMed
-
- Yang E, Tan M, Schwarz R, Richards‐Kortum R, Gillenwater A, Vigneswaran N. Noninvasive diagnostic adjuncts for the evaluation of potentially premalignant oral epithelial lesions: current limitations and future directions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125(6):670–681. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Odell E, Kujan O, Warnakulasuriya S, Sloan P. Oral epithelial dysplasia: recognition, grading and clinical significance. Oral Dis. 2021;27(8):1947–1976. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
