Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 May;55(5):1274-8.
doi: 10.1128/iai.55.5.1274-1278.1987.

Use of monoclonal antibodies in local passive immunization to prevent colonization of human teeth by Streptococcus mutans

Use of monoclonal antibodies in local passive immunization to prevent colonization of human teeth by Streptococcus mutans

J K Ma et al. Infect Immun. 1987 May.

Abstract

Local passive immunization with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) raised against streptococcal antigen (SA) I/II protects monkeys against colonization of teeth by Streptococcus mutans and the subsequent development of dental caries. In this study we extended the preclinical experiments to human subjects. In the first study of eight healthy subjects, four had anti-SA I/II MAb (immunoglobulin G2a [IgG2a]) and four had saline applied to their teeth on three occasions. A streptomycin-resistant S. mutans strain (Guy K2 strain, serotype c) was then implanted onto the teeth, and the organism was cultured sequentially from dental plaque and saliva up to 100 days after the first treatment with MAb. Decreased colonization by S. mutans was found in the dental plaque collected from smooth surfaces and fissures and in saliva of subjects whose teeth were treated with the MAb, as compared with the saline-treated control subjects. The experiment was then repeated on seven new subjects, and the effect of anti-SA I/II MAb was compared with that of an unrelated MAb to Campylobacter jejuni. The results again showed a consistently lower level of colonization of teeth in the anti-SA I/II MAb-treated subjects as compared with those sham immunized with the unrelated MAb. There was little difference in serum IgG, IgM, or IgA, gingival fluid IgG, or salivary IgA anti-SA I/II antibodies between the immunized and sham-immunized subjects, before and after the investigation. No side effects were observed, and the gingival and plaque indices remained unchanged. A sensitive radioimmunoassay failed to detect changes in anti-MAb (IgG2a) antibodies in any of the three fluids examined. We suggest that local passive immunization by means of MAb might be an alternative approach in the prevention of colonization of teeth by S. mutans and the development of dental caries.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Infect Immun. 1983 Feb;39(2):514-9 - PubMed
    1. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963 Dec;21:533-51 - PubMed
    1. Infect Immun. 1984 Apr;44(1):68-75 - PubMed
    1. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964 Feb;22:121-35 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Immunol. 1984 Sep;14(9):814-9 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances