Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Sep 5;99(10):e989-e998.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200792.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety From an Open-Label Extension of Adjunctive Cenobamate in Patients With Uncontrolled Focal Seizures

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-term Efficacy and Safety From an Open-Label Extension of Adjunctive Cenobamate in Patients With Uncontrolled Focal Seizures

Pavel Klein et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: To evaluate long-term efficacy (percent seizure frequency reduction and responder rates), safety, and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate (CNB) in an open-label extension (OLE) of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Methods: Patients (aged 18-70 years) with uncontrolled focal seizures despite treatment with 1-3 antiseizure medications who completed the 18-week double-blind study (n = 360) could enter the OLE, where they underwent a 2-week blinded conversion to CNB (target dose, 300 mg/d; min/max, 50/400 mg/d).

Results: Three hundred fifty-five patients were included in the OLE safety population (265 originally randomized to CNB, 90 originally randomized to placebo), and 354 were included in the OLE modified intent-to-treat population. As of July 2019, 58.9% of patients (209/355) were continuing CNB treatment and 141 had discontinued, including 16.6% (59/355) because of lack of efficacy, 8.7% (31/355) because of withdrawal by patient, and 7.6% (27/355) because of adverse events. The median (range) duration of OLE exposure was 53.9 (1.1-68.7) months. Retention rates at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 83%, 71%, 65%, and 62%, respectively. Median percent seizure frequency reduction over baseline increased with each 6-month OLE interval, up to 76.1% at months 43-48. Among observed patients, 16.4% (36/220) achieved 100% and 39.1% (86/220) achieved ≥90% seizure reduction during >36-48 months. Among the initial OLE modified intent-to-treat population, 10.2% of patients (36/354) achieved 100% and 24.3% (86/354) achieved ≥90% seizure reduction during >36-48 months. Similar to the double-blind study, adverse events (AEs) included dizziness, somnolence, fatigue, and headache. Serious AEs occurred in 20.3% of patients (72/355).

Discussion: Long-term efficacy, including 100% and ≥90% seizure reduction, was sustained during 48 months of CNB treatment, with 71% retention at 24 months. No new safety issues were identified. These results confirm the findings of the double-blind study and support the potential long-term clinical benefit of CNB.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that oral CNB 50-400 mg/d is effective as an adjunctive treatment for the long-term management of patients with uncontrolled focal seizures previously treated with 1-3 ASMs.

Trial registration information: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01866111 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01866111).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Patient Disposition and Reason for Discontinuation (OLE Population)
aStudy completion as reported on the end-of-study subject disposition case report form. mITT = modified intent-to-treat; OLE = open-label extension.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Plot of Time to Discontinuation During OLE
Event = early discontinuation from OLE. Patients who completed the study and patients ongoing at the date of data cutoff are considered as censored. OLE = open-label extension.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Median Percent Change in Seizure Frequency/28 Days by 6-Month Intervals During OLE (mITT Population)
Median (IQR) baseline seizure frequency/28 days during the double-blind study for the 354 patients in the mITT population was 9.5 (16.0). CNB = cenobamate; DB = double-blind; IQR = interquartile range; mITT = modified intent-to-treat; OLE = open-label extension; PBO = placebo.
Figure 4
Figure 4. 100% Reduction in Seizure Frequency by 12-Month Intervals During OLE (mITT Population)
mITT = modified intent-to-treat; OLE = open-label extension; SE = standard error.
Figure 5
Figure 5. ≥50%, ≥75%, and ≥90% Reduction in Seizure Frequency by 12-Month Intervals During OLE (mITT Population)
(A) Observed patients at each time point and (B) initial OLE mITT population. mITT = modified intent-to-treat; OLE = open-label extension.

References

    1. Hauser WA. Questioning the effectiveness of newer antiseizure medications. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(3):273-274. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3069. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Golyala A, Kwan P. Drug development for refractory epilepsy: the past 25 years and beyond. Seizure. 2017;44:147-156. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2016.11.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Z, Brodie MJ, Liew D, Kwan P. Treatment outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy treated with established and new antiepileptic drugs: a 30-year longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(3):279-286. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3949. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mula M, Zaccara G, Galimberti CA, et al. . Validated outcome of treatment changes according to International League Against Epilepsy criteria in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2019;60(6):1114-1123. doi:10.1111/epi.14685. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vingerhoets G. Cognitive effects of seizures. Seizure. 2006;15(4):221-226. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2006.02.012. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data