Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Jun 15;12(1):9966.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14094-0.

HOPS-R01 phase II trial evaluating neoadjuvant S-1 therapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

HOPS-R01 phase II trial evaluating neoadjuvant S-1 therapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Toru Nakamura et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Although neoadjuvant therapy (Nac) is recommended for high-risk resectable pancreatic cancer (R-PDAC), evidence regarding specific regimes is scarce. This report aimed to investigate the efficacy of S-1 Nac for R-PDAC. In a multicenter phase II trial, we investigated the efficacy of Nac S-1 (an oral fluoropyrimidine agent containing tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium) in R-PDAC patients. The protocol involved two cycles of preoperative S-1 chemotherapy, followed by surgery, and four cycles of postoperative S-1 chemotherapy. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS) rates and median survival time (MST) were secondary endpoints. Forty-nine patients were eligible, and 31 patients underwent resection following Nac, as per protocol (31/49; 63.3%). Per-protocol analysis included data from 31 patients, yielding the 2-year PFS rate of 58.1%, and 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of 96.8%, 54.8%, and 44.0%, respectively. MST was 49.2 months. Intention-to-treat analysis involved 49 patients, yielding the 2-year PFS rate of 40.8%, and the 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of 87.8%, 46.9%, and 33.9%, respectively. MST was 35.5 months. S-1 single regimen might be an option for Nac in R-PDAC; however, the high drop-out rate (36.7%) was a limitation of this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram of the study flow. A total of 80 patients gave informed consent for the HOPS-R01 trial between January 2014 and October 2015 and were diagnosed with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by a central review of multidetector computed tomography. Neoadjuvant (Nac) S-1 at 80 mg/m2 per day was administered for 28 consecutive days followed by a 14-day rest (one cycle). The administration of S-1 was repeated every 6 weeks for two cycles. Of 49 patients who started Nac, 33 patients completed Nac and 31 patients received pancreatectomy. Of 16 Nac-failure patients, 12 patients underwent resection (pancreatectomy).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves of progression-free survival. (A) Intention-to-treat patients (n = 49). (B) Per-protocol patients (neoadjuvant treatment completion and tumor resection, n = 31) and off-protocol patients (neoadjuvant failure or probe laparotomy, n = 18). PFS, progression-free survival; MST, median survival time.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for overall survival. (A) Intention to treat patients (n = 49). (B) Per-protocol patients (neoadjuvant treatment completion and tumor resection, n = 31) and off-protocol patients (neoadjuvant failure or probe laparotomy, n = 18). OS, overall survival; MST, median survival time.

References

    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2019) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, version 3. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreatic.pdf.7. Accessed July 2, 2019.
    1. Versteijne E, Vogel JA, Besselink MG, et al. Meta-analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2018;105:946–958. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10870. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Unno M, Hata T, Motoi F. Long-term outcome following neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer compared to upfront surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative studies by intention-to-treat analysis. Surg. Today. 2019;49:295–299. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01786-w. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mokdad AA, Minter RM, Zhu H, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection versus upfront resection for resectable pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;35:515–522. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5081. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Versteijne E, Suker M, Groothuis K, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: results of the Dutch randomized phase III PREOPANC trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;38:1763–1773. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02274. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources