Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jun 15;12(1):10016.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13831-9.

Prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Crestani Adrien et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Seroma or lymphocele remains the most common complication after mastectomy and lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Many different techniques are available to prevent this complication: wound drainage, reduction of the dead space by flap fixation, use of various types of energy, external compression dressings, shoulder immobilization or physical activity, as well as numerous drugs and glues. We searched MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for publications addressing the issue of prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy. Quality was assessed using Hawker's quality assessment tool. Incidence of seroma or lymphocele were collected. Fifteen randomized controlled trials including a total of 1766 patients undergoing radical mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer were retrieved. The incidence of lymphocele or seroma in the study population was 24.2% (411/1698): 25.2% (232/920) in the test groups and 23.0% (179/778) in the control groups. Neither modification of surgical technique (RR 0.86; 95% CI [0.72, 1.03]) nor application of a medical treatment (RR 0.96; 95% CI [0.72, 1.29]) was effective in preventing lymphocele. On the contrary, decreasing the drainage time increased the risk of lymphocele (RR 1.88; 95% CI [1.43, 2.48). There was no publication bias but the studies were of medium to low quality. To conclude, despite the heterogeneity of study designs, drainage appears to be the most effective technique, although the overall quality of the data is low.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of literature screening and selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot for seroma incidence following application of a treatment designed to prevent lymphocele after mastectomy with axillary lymphadenectomy. Risk ratios are shown with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for seroma incidence following application of a medical treatment designed to preventing lymphocele after mastectomy with axillary lymphadenectomy. Risk ratios are shown with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot for seroma incidence following application of a surgical technique designed to prevent lymphocele after mastectomy with axillary lymphadenectomy. Risk ratios are shown with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot for seroma incidence following application of a modified drainage method designed to prevent lymphocele after mastectomy with axillary lymphadenectomy. Risk ratios are shown with 95% confidence intervals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roses DF, Brooks AD, Harris MN, Shapiro RL, Mitnick J. Complications of level I and II axillary dissection in the treatment of carcinoma of the breast. Ann. Surg. 1999;230(2):194. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199908000-00009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Reintgen DS, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, Hunt KK, Giuliano AE, American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25(24):3657–3663. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4062. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomson DR, Sadideen H, Furniss D. Wound drainage after axillary dissection for carcinoma of the breast. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;10:006823. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Granzier RWY, van Bastelaar J, van Kuijk SMJ, Hintzen KFH, Heymans C, Theunissen LLB, et al. Reducing seroma formation and its sequelae after mastectomy by closure of the dead space: The interim analysis of a multi-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial (SAM trial) Breast. 2019;46:81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.05.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lumachi F, Basso SMM, Santeufemia DA, Bonamini M, Chiara GB. Ultrasonic dissection system technology in breast cancer: A case-control study in a large cohort of patients requiring axillary dissection. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142(2):399–404. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2746-0. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms