Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;30(10):7835-7843.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07208-x. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

Fall predictors in hospitalized patients living with cancer: a case-control study

Affiliations

Fall predictors in hospitalized patients living with cancer: a case-control study

Anita Zeneli et al. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To identify fall predictors and develop an assessment tool to be used for screening hospitalized cancer patients at risk for fall.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in 2018 at a cancer center in Northern Italy. The study participants were 448 adult cancer patients admitted to the oncology ward from 2009 to 2013. The case group consisted of 112 patients presenting at least one fall, while controls were randomly chosen by matching each case for age, sex, and admission period with three patients who did not fall. Data for the fall predictors were extracted from the electronic medical records. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between patient's characteristics and fall risk.

Results: The overall prevalence of patients having at least one candidate fall predictor was high (98%). Seven of the studied variables showed an independent association with fall risk at multivariate analysis. These were tumor site, the presence of neurologic diseases, gait imbalance disorders, fatigue, and the assumption of certain medications such as diuretics, hypnotics, and opioids (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals in brackets were 3.78 (1.78-8.13), 2.26 (1.08-4.77), 4.22 (1.87-9.52), 2.76 (1.45-5.26), 2.66 (1.52-4.66), 2.41 (1.20-4.85), and 3.03 (1.68-5.45), respectively).

Conclusions: In this study, we identified falling risk factors in an Italian population of hospitalized cancer patients and developed a new risk assessment tool. An external validation is necessary before implementing our screening tool in clinical practice.

Keywords: Fall predictors; Fall risk evaluation; Hospitalized cancer patients; Risk assessment tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. National Patient Safety Agency NPSA (2007) The third report from the Patient Safety Observatory: slips trips and falls in hospital available from: https://cupdf.com/document/falls.html
    1. Mikos M, Banas T, Czerw A, Banas B, Strzępek Ł, Curyło M (2021) Hospital inpatient falls across clinical departments. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(15):8167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158167 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Capone LJ, Albert NM, Bena JF, Tang AS (2012) Predictors of a fall event in hospitalized patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 39(5):E407–E415. https://doi.org/10.1188/12.ONF.E407-E415 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allan-Gibbs R (2010) Falls and hospitalized patients with cancer: a review of the literature. Clin J Oncol 14(6):784–792. https://doi.org/10.1188/10.CJON.784-792 - DOI
    1. Spoelstra SL, Given BA, Schutte DL, Sikorskii A, You M, Given CW (2013) Do older adults with cancer fall more often? A comparative analysis of falls in those with and without cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 40(2):E69-78. https://doi.org/10.1188/13.ONF.E69-E78 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources