Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May;11(5):1413-1422.
doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-2074.

Endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors in East Asian countries: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors in East Asian countries: a systematic review

Jinguo Liu et al. Transl Cancer Res. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of different endoscopic resection methods for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in East Asian countries.

Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. Colorectal LSTs of the included studies were resected with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The main outcomes involved rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, adverse events and recurrence.

Results: A total of 20 studies were finally included in the present study. The total number of lesions were 3,903 (EMR: 1,230, ESD: 2,673). EMR-en bloc resection was obtained in 395/591 (66.8%), with ESD-en bloc resection reported in 2,020/2,265 (89.2%) [odds ratio (OR) 0.244, P<0.0001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.197-0.304]. EMR-R0 resection was achieved in 409/547 (74.8%), which was lower than that of ESD (1,895/2,241, 84.6%) (OR 0.541, P<0.0001, 95% CI: 0.432-0.677). Bleedings occurred more frequently in EMR than in ESD group (10.4% vs. 3.1%, OR 3.559, P<0.0001, 95% CI: 2.618-4.836). Rates of perforations in EMR and ESD were 0.4% and 4.1% (OR 0.099, P<0.0001, 95% CI: 0.036-0.27). Recurrence of EMR was higher than ESD group (6.3% vs. 1.0%, OR 6.732, P<0.0001, 95% CI: 3.751-12.082).

Discussion: Endoscopic resections of colorectal LSTs are safe and effective. ESD leads to higher rates of en bloc and R0 resection, as well as lower rates of bleeding and recurrence, but it has a high risk of perforation, compared with EMR.

Keywords: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR); colorectal laterally spreading tumors (colorectal LSTs); endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tcr-21-2074/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) procedure. (A) 2.0 cm × 2.5 cm, rectum, laterally spreading tumor-non-granular type (LST-NG) with flat elevated subtype; (B) LST-NG after submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate, methylene blue and glycerol fructose solution (1:1:4); (C) endoscopic snare resection; (D) closure with titanium clips.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure. (A) 3.0 cm × 3.5 cm, rectum, laterally spreading tumor-granular type (LST-G) with nodular mixed subtype; (B) submucosal injection with Sodium hyaluronate, methylene blue and glycerol fructose solution (1:1:4) and a circumferential mucosal incision using a Jet bipolar needle knife (Jet B-knife); (C) submucosal dissection with a Jet B-knife; (D) titanium clips closing wound; (E) en bloc resected specimen.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424. 10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sano Y, Byeon JS, Li XB, et al. Colorectal cancer screening of the general population in East Asia. Dig Endosc 2016;28:243-9. 10.1111/den.12579 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, et al. Prediction of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea, 2018. Cancer Res Treat 2018;50:317-23. 10.4143/crt.2018.142 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:115-32. 10.3322/caac.21338 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687-96. 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370 - DOI - PMC - PubMed