Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216784.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16784.

Australian Women's Intentions and Psychological Outcomes Related to Breast Density Notification and Information: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Australian Women's Intentions and Psychological Outcomes Related to Breast Density Notification and Information: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Hankiz Dolan et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Whether the benefits of notifying women about breast density outweigh the potential harms to inform current and future mammogram screening practice remains unknown.

Objective: To assess the effect of mammographic breast density notification and information provision on women's intention to seek supplemental screening and psychological outcomes.

Design, setting, and participants: A 3-arm online randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 10 to 31, 2021. Data analysis was conducted from September 1 to October 20, 2021. Participants included Australian residents identifying as female, aged between 40 and 74 years, with no history of breast cancer who were residing in jurisdictions without existing breast density notification with screening mammograms.

Interventions: Women were randomized to receive 1 of the following hypothetical breast screening test result letters: screening mammogram result letter without breast density messaging (control), screening mammogram result letter with breast density messaging and an existing density information letter taken from a screening service in Australia (intervention 1), and screening mammogram result letter with breast density messaging and a health literacy-sensitive version of the letter adapted for people with lower health literacy (intervention 2).

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were intention to seek supplemental screening; feeling anxious (uneasy, worried, or nervous), informed, or confused; and having breast cancer worry.

Results: A total of 1420 Australian women were randomized and included in the final analysis. The largest group consisted of 603 women aged 60 to 74 years (42.5%). Compared with the control cohort (n = 480), women who received density notification via intervention 1 (n = 470) and intervention 2 (n = 470) reported a significantly higher intention to seek supplemental screening (0.8% vs 15.6% and 14.2%; P < .001) and feeling anxious (14.2% vs 49.4% and 48.5%; P < .001), confusion (7.8% vs 24.0% and 23.6%; P < .001), and worry about breast cancer (quite/very worried: 6.9% vs 17.2% and 15.5%; P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in these outcomes between the 2 intervention groups.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, breast density notification and information integrated with screening mammogram results increased women's intention to seek supplemental screening and made women feel anxious, confused, or worried about breast cancer. These findings have relevance and implications for mammogram screening services and policy makers considering whether and, if so, how best to implement widespread notification of breast density as part of mammography screening.

Trial registration: ACTRN12621000253808.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Hersch reported receiving grants from the Australian National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) during the conduct of the study and grants from Cancer Institute NSW outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Screening Intentions After Reading the Letters
Responses from 27 participants were excluded due to a technical error allowing for responses in more than one category without instruction to do so. MRI indicates magnetic resonance imaging; WA, Western Australia.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boyd NF. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013. doi:10.14694/EdBook_AM.2013.33.e57 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. . Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):168-175. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Tosteson AN, et al. ; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium . Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(10):673-681. doi:10.7326/M14-1465 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brentnall AR, Warren R, Harkness EF, et al. . Mammographic density change in a cohort of premenopausal women receiving tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention over 5 years. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22(1):101. doi:10.1186/s13058-020-01340-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colditz GA, Bohlke K. Priorities for the primary prevention of breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(3):186-194. doi:10.3322/caac.21225 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types