Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0270038.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270038. eCollection 2022.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among college students in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among college students in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ling Li et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Since the outbreak of the respiratory infectious disease caused by the novel coronavirus in 2019, the COVID-19 epidemic has posed a serious threat to the life and safety of the public, and has also seriously affected the normal study and life of college students in China. Although a series of studies have been conducted on college students' knowledge, attitudes and practices of COVID-19, the results vary widely. This study aimed to evaluate the pooled estimated level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) about COVID-19 among college students in China.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search on Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Database and Wanfang Database up to 13 February 2022. We then assessed the quality of included studies using a checklist developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for cross-sectional studies and analyzed using STATA.15 after two researchers independently extracted relevant data and entered them into Microsoft Excel. Funnel plots and Egger's regression tests were used to check for publication bias, and sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the results. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis, on the basis of which subgroup analyses were performed by time of investigation (study period) and by gender and major of the subjects.

Result: A total of 42 studies including 174,440 subjects were included in this review, and the quality of the included studies was mainly intermediate and advanced. The findings of the meta-analysis showed that the overall levels of Chinese college students' knowledge, positive and negative attitudes, and practice of preventive measures towards COVID-19 were 74% (95%CI: 69%-79%), 84% (95%CI: 80%-88%), 31% (95%CI: 23%-38%) and 82% (95%CI: 77%-86%), respectively. The results of subgroup analysis showed that female and medical college students had higher levels of knowledge and practice on COVID-19.

Conclusion: The study findings showed that the overall KAP level of college students in China included in the study was relatively optimistic. Influenced by gender, major and time, there were differences in the KAP level of college students. In order to promote the effective prophylaxis and control of pandemic, we recommend implementing targeted measures to improve the awareness rate of COVID-19-related knowledge among this group and the implementation rate of COVID-19 preventive measures among male and non-medical college students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA 2009 flow diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot showing the overall proportion of knowledge about COVID-19 among study subjects.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Forest plot showing the pooled proportion of positive attitudes towards COVID-19 among study participants.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Forest plot showing the pooled proportion of negative attitudes towards COVID-19 among study participants.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Forest plot showing the pooled proportion of using specific measures to fight COVID-19 among study subjects.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Begg’s funnel plot checking the publication bias of proportion of positive attitudes about COVID-19 among study subjects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis. 2020;91(1):157–60. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Timeline of WHO’s response to COVID-19. [cited 10 March 2022]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interact....
    1. Worldometer.info. COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. [cited 10 March 2022]. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.
    1. Su S, Wong G, Shi W, Liu J, Lai AC, Zhou J, et al.. Epidemiology, genetic recombination, and pathogenesis of coronaviruses. Trends in microbiology. 2016;24(6):490–502. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.03.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. China NHCotPsRo. Diagnosis and treatment plan for COVID-19 (trial version 8 revision). Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021;14(2):81–8.