Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 8;377(6602):eabg9302.
doi: 10.1126/science.abg9302. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

Interleukin-17 governs hypoxic adaptation of injured epithelium

Affiliations

Interleukin-17 governs hypoxic adaptation of injured epithelium

Piotr Konieczny et al. Science. .

Abstract

Mammalian cells autonomously activate hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIFs) to ensure survival in low-oxygen environments. We report here that injury-induced hypoxia is insufficient to trigger HIF1α in damaged epithelium. Instead, multimodal single-cell and spatial transcriptomics analyses and functional studies reveal that retinoic acid-related orphan receptor γt+ (RORγt+) γδ T cell-derived interleukin-17A (IL-17A) is necessary and sufficient to activate HIF1α. Protein kinase B (AKT) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) signaling proximal of IL-17 receptor C (IL-17RC) activates mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and consequently HIF1α. The IL-17A-HIF1α axis drives glycolysis in wound front epithelia. Epithelial-specific loss of IL-17RC, HIF1α, or blockade of glycolysis derails repair. Our findings underscore the coupling of inflammatory, metabolic, and migratory programs to expedite epithelial healing and illuminate the immune cell-derived inputs in cellular adaptation to hypoxic stress during repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Skin-resident RORγt cells direct wound re-epithelialization.
(A) UMAP visualization of individual samples (control, n = 1443 cells; D3, n = 1997 cells; D5, n = 1486 cells). (B) Dot plot of cytokine expression in control and wounded lymphocytes. Shown is the frequency of cells expressing gene (percentage) and average expression per cluster (average). RORγt+ cells (yellow) are enriched at the edge of human (C) (n = 3, N = 1) and murine (D) (n ≥ 4, N = 3) acute wounds. Magenta, keratin (K)14; cyan, DAPI nuclei. White arrows mark RORγt cells. (E) Impaired re-epithelialization in RORγt-deficient (GFP-KI) compared with WT animals. Shown are images and quantifications of integrin α5+ (green), K14+ (red) migrating epidermal tongue from full-thickness silicone-splinted (top) and unsplinted (bottom) D3 wounds. The dashed lines and arrows mark the beginning and end of migrating tongue, respectively. White, EdU; blue, DAPI nuclei; w.b., wound bed (n ≥ 7, N = 3). (F) Wound lymphocytes have a higher frequency (percentage) and expression of proliferation genes (Mki67, Cdk1, and Top2a than control skin. (G) Wound RORγt cells actively proliferate. Shown is an immunofluorescence image of D3 wounded Rorc-EGFPTg mice after a 24-hour EdU pulse. White, EdU; blue, DAPI nuclei; green, RORγt+ cells; red, keratin (K)14 (n = 3, N = 3). (H) FTY720 treatment does not alter wound re-epithelialization (n ≥ 7, N = 3). In (C), (D), and (G), white dashed lines denote dermo-epidermal borders and yellow boxes define magnified areas. Scale bars in (C), (D), and (E), 100 μm; scale bar in (G), 50 μm. Significance was determined using a two-tailed t test and a 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. RORγt+ γδT cells drive re-epithelialization through epidermal IL-17RC.
(A) Hematoxylin and eosin–stained tissue image (top) and ST plot of microarray spots (bottom) of unwounded and D3 wounded skin (unwounded, n = 1; wounded, n = 2). Scale bars, 200 μm. (B) UMAP plot and cluster annotation of ST spots based on marker genes in fig. S5. (C) γδ T/MAIT clusters are enriched in wound edge epithelium. P-value score table from MIA of D3 wounded ST clusters and CITE-seq effector lymphocyte clusters. Integrin α5+, K14+ migrating epidermal tongue length in unsplinted D3 wounds from TcrdCreER;Rorcfl/fl and Rorcfl/fl (D) (n ≥ 7, N = 3). Mr1−/− and Mr1Het (E) (n ≥ 4, N = 3). Cd4Cre/−; Rorcfl/fl and Cd4Cre/− (F) (n = 5, N = 3). (G) γδ T/MAIT cell clusters dominantly express Il17a and Il17f. Dot plot of genes from D3 wounded skin CITE-seq analysis. Frequency of cells expressing stated gene (percent) and average expression per cluster (average). (H) rmIL-17A administration augments the re-epithelialization in GFP-KI mice. Experimental schematic (left) and quantification of D3 migrating tongue length of GFP-KI skin intradermally injected with rmIL-17A or PBS (right) (n = 4, N = 2). (I) Spatial plots of Il17rc and Il17ra reveal an up-regulation of these receptors at the wound’s edge. (J) IL-17RC expression on epithelial cells drives re-epithelialization. Quantification of migrating tongue length from splinted D3 wounds Krt14Cre; Il17rcfl/fl mice (n ≥ 5, N = 2). Significance was determined using a two-tailed t test and a 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.. RORγt+ cells control wound edge epithelial HIF1α.
ST spots (A) and UMAP plot (B) of annotated clusters (marker genes in fig. S7) from WT and GFP-KI D3 wounded skin samples (WT, n = 2; GFP-KI, n = 3). (C) KEGG pathways enriched in WT versus GFP-KI cluster 7 spots. (D) Spatial plots of Hif1a expression in D3 WT and GFP-KI wounds. (E) WT migrating tongues have higher HIF1α expression than GFP-KI migrating tongues. Red, top, K14; yellow, top, HIF1α (pseudocolor fire, bottom); cyan, top, DAPI nuclei. Quantification of HIF1α in integrin α5+ cells from GFP-KI and WT D3 wounds (n = 6, N = 3). (F) Quantification of HIF1α in integrin α5+cells from WT and Krt14Cre; Il17rcfl/fl D3 wounds (n = 5, N = 2). (G) Pseudocolor fire view images and quantification of PIM staining in D3 WT and GFP-KI wounds (n = 4, N = 2). (H) Fiber probe measurement of unwounded and D3 wounded tissue oxygen (n ≥ 3, N = 2). (I) Impaired re-epithelialization in epithelial HIF1α-deficient animals (Hif1aEKO) compared with WT. Confocal images and corresponding quantifications of integrin α5+ (yellow), K14+ (red) migrating epidermal tongue from splinted D3 wounds. The dashed line and arrows mark the beginning and end of migrating tongue, respectively. Cyan, DAPI nuclei; w.b., wound bed (n ≥ 5, N = 3). Scale bars in (E), 50 μm; scale bars in (G) and (I), 100 μm. For (E), (G), and (I), two-tailed t test at a 95% confidence interval was used. For (H), one-way ANOVA multiple-comparisons test was used.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.. IL-17A induces HIF1α through epidermal IL-17RC.
(A) Intradermal injection of rmIL-17A in unwounded skin induces epidermal hyperplasia and HIF1α. Magenta, K14; yellow, HIF1α; cyan, DAPI nuclei (n = 5, N = 3). (B) Epidermal organoids cultured for 6 days at 21% O2, ± rmIL-17A stimulation for 5 days (see experimental schematic in fig. S10C) robustly up-regulate HIF1α. Quantification of HIF1α staining normalized to controls. Red, K14; green, HIF1α; white, phalloidin F actin; blue, DAPI nuclei (n = 3, N = 3). (C) rmIL-17A induced nuclear HIF1α in WT mice but not epidermal IL-17RC–deficient (Il17rcEKO) mice (n = 3, N = 2). Staining and color scheme are the same as in (A). (D) IL-17A–induced HIF1α in organoids is dependent on epidermal IL-17RC (n = 4, N = 2). (E) Epidermal response to rmIL-17A is accompanied by increased phosphorylation of S6 (p-S6Ser240/244, green) (n = 3, N = 2). (F) rmIL-17A–induced p-S6Ser240/244 (green) requires epidermal IL-17RC (n = 3, N = 2). In (E) and (F), blue, DAPI nuclei. In (A) and (C), white asterisks label autofluorescence. In (A) to (C) and (E) and (F), white dashed lines demarcate dermo-epidermal junction or organoid boundaries. Scale bars, 50 μm. For (A) to (C), two-tailed t test at a 95% confidence interval was used. For (D), two-way ANOVA multiple-comparisons test was used.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.. ERK/AKT signaling downstream of IL-17RC controls mTOR and HIF1α.
(A) Experimental schematic of inhibitor treatment in control and rmIL-17A–stimulated organoids. (B) rmIL-17A–treated organoids (D5) have increased pmTORS2448, p-S6KT389, and p-S6S240/244 that is diminished after 12 hours of rapamycin (Rapa) treatment. Vehicle (Veh), N = 2. (C) Rapamycin abrogates rmIL-17A–mediated HIF1α expression in normoxia (21% O2). Quantification of HIF1α staining normalized to controls (n ≥ 5, N = 4). (D) IL-17A up-regulates Hif1a transcripts through mTOR (n = 5, N = 2). (E) Inhibiting AKT (MK-2206) and/or ERK (U0126) for 3 hours blocks rmIL-17A–induced p-S6KT389, p-S6S240/244, and HIF1α (N = 2). (F) IL-17A stimulates p-S6S240/244 and HIF1α in organoids cultured under normoxic or hypoxic (2% O2) conditions (N = 3). (G) Rapamycin abrogates IL-17A–mediated HIF1α expression in hypoxia (n = 4, N = 3). (H) Schematic of proposed mechanism illustrating that AKT and ERK activation proximal of IL-17RC induces mTOR and HIFα. Chronic hypoxia inhibits mTOR and consequently HIF1α. Significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA multiple-comparisons test. In (B), (E), (F), and (G), protein quantifications are relative to the presented internal β-actin controls.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.. IL-17A–HIF1α-mediated metabolic reprograming fuels re-epithelialization.
(A) ST plots of hk2, Pgk1, and Slc2a1 expression in GFP-KI (n = 3) and WT (n = 2) wounds. (B) Increased expression of glycolytic enzymes after rmIL-17A treatment (normalized to control) (n = 6, N = 4). (C) rmIL-17A stimulation results in functional enhancement of glycolysis. Representative ECAR of organoids cultured in the presence or absence of rmIL-17A. There were 22 technical replicates. (D and E) IL-17A–induced expression of glycolytic enzymes is abrogated in rapamycin-treated (D) and Hif1aEKO (E) organoids (n ≥ 5, N = 2). (F and G) pseudocolor fire images and quantifications of glucose transporter 1 staining in D3 WT and Il17rcEKO (n ≥ 5, N = 2) (F) and WT and Hif1aEKO (n ≥ 4, N = 2) (G) migrating tongue. Scale bars, 100 μm. (H) Inhibition of HIF1α (BAY872243) and glycolysis (2-DG) impairs the migration of primary human keratinocytes in the presence and absence of rhIL-17A. Yellow dashed line marks scratch wound edges. Scratched areas were quantified as a percentage relative to the start area at 0 hours (n = 5, N = 3). Scale bars, 500 μm. In (B), (C), (F), and (G), two-tailed t test at a 95% confidence interval was used. In (D) and (E), two-way ANOVA multiple-comparisons test was used. In (H), one-way ANOVA was used.

Comment in

References

    1. Chovatiya R, Medzhitov R, Stress, inflammation, and defense of homeostasis. Mol. Cell 54, 281–288 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.030; - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M, Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci. Transl. Med 6, 265sr6 (2014). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337; - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belkaid Y, Harrison OJ, Homeostatic immunity and the microbiota. Immunity 46, 562–576 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.008; - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrison OJ et al., Commensal-specific T cell plasticity promotes rapid tissue adaptation to injury. Science 363, eaat6280 (2019). doi: 10.1126/science.aat6280; - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Naik S, Larsen SB, Cowley CJ, Fuchs E, Two to Tango: Dialog between Immunity and Stem Cells in Health and Disease. Cell 175, 908–920 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.071; - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances