Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Nov 23;16(11):1714-1724.
doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac081.

Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial

Wolfgang Kruis et al. J Crohns Colitis. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Proctitis is the least extensive type of ulcerative colitis, for which rectal therapy is rarely studied and is underused. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient's preference of a novel formulation of budesonide suppository 4 mg, compared with a commercially available budesonide rectal foam 2 mg, for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis.

Methods: This was a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either budesonide 4 mg suppository or budesonide 2 mg foam once daily for 8 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were changes from baseline to Week 8 in clinical symptoms, for which clinical remission was defined as having a modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index [UC-DAI] subscore for stool frequency of 0 or 1 and a subscore for rectal bleeding of 0, and mucosal healing, defined as having a modified UC-DAI subscore for mucosal appearance of 0 or 1. Using a more stringent criterion, we additionally analysed deepened mucosal healing, which was defined as a mucosal appearance subscore of 0. Patient's preference, physician's global assessment, and quality of life were also assessed and analysed.

Results: Overall, 286 and 291 patients were included in the 4 mg suppository and 2 mg foam groups, respectively. Budesonide 4 mg suppository met the prespecified criterion for non-inferiority to the 2 mg foam in both co-primary endpoints of clinical remission and mucosal healing. Secondary endpoints consistently supported the non-inferiority of the suppository. Trends in favour of the suppository were observed in the subgroup of mesalazine non-responders. More patients reported a preference for the suppository over rectal foam.

Conclusions: In patients with ulcerative proctitis, budesonide 4 mg suppository was non-inferior to budesonide 2 mg foam in efficacy, and both were safe and well tolerated.

Keywords: Clinical trials; budesonide; rectal foam; rectal suppository; ulcerative proctitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT disposition diagram. *Safety Set. **For details please see Table 1. ***One patient left the study due to an uncertain pregnancy test but was defined as delayed exclusion, even though ‘uncertain pregnancy test’ was not specified in the study protocol as one of the criteria for delayed exclusion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Primary Analysis of remission rates for clinical remission and mucosal healing by the end of treatment or discontinuation [PPS and FAS]. Clinical remission was defined as having a UC-DAI stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Mucosal healing was defined as having a mucosal appearance subscore of 0 or 1; p-value: Farrington–Manning test [one-sided] with non-inferiority margin = 10%. PPS, per-protocol set; FAS, full analysis set; UC-DAI, Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Patients’ overall acceptance of budesonide rectal suppository [4 mg] and foam [2 mg], full analysis set [FAS].

References

    1. Langholz E, Munkholm P, Nielsen OH, Kreiner S, Binder V.. Incidence and prevalence of ulcerative colitis in Copenhagen county from 1962 to 1987. Scand J Gastroenterol 1991;26:1247–56. - PubMed
    1. Langholz E, Munkholm P, Davidsen M, Nielsen OH, Binder V.. Changes in extent of ulcerative colitis: A study on the course and prognostic factors. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996;31:260–6. - PubMed
    1. Tontini GE, Vecchi M, Pastorelli L, Neurath MF, Neumann H.. Differential diagnosis in inflammatory bowel disease colitis: State of the art and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:21–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harbord M, Eliakim R, Bettenworth D, et al. . Third European evidence-based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 2: Current management. J Crohns Colitis 2017;11:769–84. - PubMed
    1. Marshall JK, Thabane M, Steinhart AH, et al. . Rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD004115. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding