Addressing the environmental sustainability of eye health-care delivery: a scoping review
- PMID: 35709809
- PMCID: PMC7618290
- DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00074-2
Addressing the environmental sustainability of eye health-care delivery: a scoping review
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Planet Health 2022; 6: e524-34.Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Aug;6(8):e644. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00175-9. Lancet Planet Health. 2022. PMID: 35932783 No abstract available.
Abstract
The demand for eye care-the most common medical speciality in some countries-is increasing globally due to both demographic change and the development of eye health-care services in low-income and middle-income countries. This expansion of service provision needs to be environmentally sustainable. We conducted a scoping review to establish the nature and extent of the literature describing the environmental costs of delivering eye-care services, identify interventions to diminish the environmental impact of eye care, and identify key sustainability themes that are not yet being addressed. We identified 16 peer-reviewed articles for analysis, all published since 2009. Despite a paucity of research evidence, there is a need for the measurement of environmental impacts associated with eye care to be standardised along with the methodological tools to assess these impacts. The vastly different environmental costs of delivering clinical services with similar clinical outcomes in different regulatory settings is striking; in one example, a phacoemulsification cataract extraction in a UK hospital produced more than 20 times the greenhouse gas emission of the same procedure in an Indian hospital. The environmental costs must be systematically included when evaluating the risks and benefits of new interventions or policies aimed at promoting safety in high-income countries.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests. This review was undertaken as part of the Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health, which was supported by grants from The Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust, Moorfields Eye Charity (grant number GR001061), National Institute for Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, The Wellcome Trust (grant number 20190426_PH2), Sightsavers, The Fred Hollows Foundation, SEVA Foundation, British Council for the Prevention of Blindness, and the Christian Blind Mission. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing.
Figures
References
-
- Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, et al. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet. 2009;373:1693–733. - PubMed
-
- Watts N, Amann M, Ayeb-Karlsson S, et al. The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health. Lancet. 2018;391:581–630. - PubMed
-
- Malik A, Lenzen M, McAlister S, McGain F. The carbon footprint of Australian health care. Lancet Planet Health. 2018;2:e27–35. - PubMed
-
- Eckelman MJ, Huang K, Lagasse R, Senay E, Dubrow R, Sherman JD. Health care pollution and public health damage in the United States: an update. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020;39:2071–79. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
