Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;6(6):e524-e534.
doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00074-2.

Addressing the environmental sustainability of eye health-care delivery: a scoping review

Affiliations

Addressing the environmental sustainability of eye health-care delivery: a scoping review

John C Buchan et al. Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Jun.

Erratum in

Abstract

The demand for eye care-the most common medical speciality in some countries-is increasing globally due to both demographic change and the development of eye health-care services in low-income and middle-income countries. This expansion of service provision needs to be environmentally sustainable. We conducted a scoping review to establish the nature and extent of the literature describing the environmental costs of delivering eye-care services, identify interventions to diminish the environmental impact of eye care, and identify key sustainability themes that are not yet being addressed. We identified 16 peer-reviewed articles for analysis, all published since 2009. Despite a paucity of research evidence, there is a need for the measurement of environmental impacts associated with eye care to be standardised along with the methodological tools to assess these impacts. The vastly different environmental costs of delivering clinical services with similar clinical outcomes in different regulatory settings is striking; in one example, a phacoemulsification cataract extraction in a UK hospital produced more than 20 times the greenhouse gas emission of the same procedure in an Indian hospital. The environmental costs must be systematically included when evaluating the risks and benefits of new interventions or policies aimed at promoting safety in high-income countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests. This review was undertaken as part of the Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health, which was supported by grants from The Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust, Moorfields Eye Charity (grant number GR001061), National Institute for Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, The Wellcome Trust (grant number 20190426_PH2), Sightsavers, The Fred Hollows Foundation, SEVA Foundation, British Council for the Prevention of Blindness, and the Christian Blind Mission. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses flow diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2. Number of studies meeting the inclusion criteria by year of publication
Figure 3
Figure 3. Waste produced from one phacoemulsification in the UK (A) and 32 cases in India (B)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Balance of risks between actual and perceived safety promoted by health-care interventions

References

    1. Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, et al. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet. 2009;373:1693–733. - PubMed
    1. Watts N, Amann M, Ayeb-Karlsson S, et al. The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health. Lancet. 2018;391:581–630. - PubMed
    1. Malik A, Lenzen M, McAlister S, McGain F. The carbon footprint of Australian health care. Lancet Planet Health. 2018;2:e27–35. - PubMed
    1. Eckelman MJ, Huang K, Lagasse R, Senay E, Dubrow R, Sherman JD. Health care pollution and public health damage in the United States: an update. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020;39:2071–79. - PubMed
    1. Eckelman MJ, Sherman JD, MacNeill AJ. Life cycle environmental emissions and health damages from the Canadian healthcare system: an economic–environmental–epidemiological analysis. PLoS Med. 2018;15:e1002623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002623. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types