Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 16;12(6):e058326.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058326.

Broadening the diversity of consumers engaged in guidelines: a scoping review

Anneliese Synnot  1   2 , Sophie Hill  3 , Allison Jauré  4   5 , Bronwen Merner  3 , Kelvin Hill  6 , Peta Bates  7 , Alexandra Liacos  8 , Tari Turner  2
Affiliations

Broadening the diversity of consumers engaged in guidelines: a scoping review

Anneliese Synnot et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Guideline developers are encouraged to engage patients, carers and their representatives ('consumers') from diverse backgrounds in guideline development to produce more widely applicable guidelines. However, consumers from diverse backgrounds are infrequently included in guidelines and there is scant research to support guideline developers to do this.

Objectives: To identify principles and approaches to broaden the diversity of consumers engaged in guideline development.

Design: Scoping review and semi-structured interviews.

Methods: We conducted comprehensive searches to March 2020 for studies, reports and guidance documents. Inclusion criteria included the terms 'consumer' (patients, carers and their representatives), 'diversity' (defined using the PROGRESS-PLUS mnemonic) and 'consumer engagement' (the active involvement of consumers at any stage of guideline development). We also conducted four interviews with consumers and guideline developers. We used descriptive synthesis to identify themes, and summarised information about implemented approaches used to broaden diversity of consumers in guidelines.

Results: From 10 included documents, we identified eight themes. Themes covered general engagement concepts (Respectful partnerships; Recruitment; Expectations, process and review); specific concepts about guideline development group (GDG) engagement (Characteristics of guideline personnel; Consumers' role, characteristics and prominence; Preparing and supporting consumers); and other (non-GDG) approaches (Online methods; Consultations and research-based approaches). The most commonly included PROGRESS-PLUS categories were Disability, Race/culture/ethnicity/language, Place of residence and Other vulnerable (eg, 'disadvantaged groups'). Each theme included the views of both consumers and guideline developers. We found descriptions of 12 implemented engagement approaches to broaden diversity of consumers in guidelines.

Conclusions: Relationship-building, mitigating power imbalances and meeting consumers where they are at underpin our findings. Engaging with diverse groups may require greater attention to building formal, respectful partnerships and employing inclusive engagement methods.

Keywords: epidemiology; protocols & guidelines; statistics & research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared

References

    1. Dans AM, Dans L, Oxman AD, et al. . Assessing equity in clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:540–6. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.10.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in Guideline development: 12. incorporating considerations of equity. Health Res Policy Syst 2006;4:24. 10.1186/1478-4505-4-24 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eslava-Schmalbach J, Sandoval-Vargas G, Mosquera P. Incorporating equity into developing and implementing for evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Rev Salud Publica 2011;13:339–51. 10.1590/S0124-00642011000200015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv 1992;22:429–45. 10.2190/986L-LHQ6-2VTE-YRRN - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oliver S. Health promotion, inequalities and young people’s health: A systematic review of research. London: University of London; 2008.

Publication types