Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jan 8;13(e3):e528-e536.
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003642.

Global quality of life in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Global quality of life in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Akbar Javan Biparva et al. BMJ Support Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to cover the existing research gap and contribute to existing knowledge to provide both researchers and clinicians with a better profile on the topic and consequently help improve the quality of life (QoL) of patients with BC.

Methods: A comprehensive review of original articles published in English from January 2000 to October 2021 from databases including Embase, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

Results: Based on the meta-regression which examined a total of 9012 patients with BC, the QoL score calculated by EORTC QLQ-C30 was 64.72 (95% CI 59.24 to 70.20), while the score obtained from FACT-B was 84.39 (95% CI 64.24 to 104.54) and the scores from QLQ-BR23 and SF-36 were 66.33 (95% CI 62.76 to 69.90) and 57.23 (95% CI 47.65 to 66.82), respectively. A meta-analysis affirmed a significant direct relationship between the QoL score of patients with BC and their age (p=0.03). The results also revealed that the QoL scores of patients who had completed treatment were higher than those who were currently under treatment.

Conclusion: The present systematic review identified several factors that affect the QoL of women with BC worldwide and provided several implications for developing policy interventions to effectively improve the QoL of women with BC. In this way, clinicians can sufficiently give advice to their patients with the purpose of improving their QoL. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022309791.

Keywords: breast; cancer; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the review process (PRISMA). PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta-regression based on year of publication and age.

References

    1. Society AC. Breast cancer facts & figures 2019–2020. American Cancer Society, 2019: 1–44.
    1. Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol 2019;30:1194–220. 10.1093/annonc/mdz173 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Leeuwen M, Husson O, Alberti P, et al. Understanding the quality of life (QOL) issues in survivors of cancer: towards the development of an EORTC QOL cancer survivorship questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018;16:1–15. 10.1186/s12955-018-0920-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bottomley A, Reijneveld JC, Koller M, et al. Current state of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research. Eur J Cancer 2019;121:55–63. 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.08.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gonzalez L, Bardach A, Palacios A, et al. Health-Related quality of life in patients with breast cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncologist 2021;26:e794–806. 10.1002/onco.13709 - DOI - PMC - PubMed