Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 16;12(1):10149.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14555-6.

Perceived facial age and biochemical indicators of glycemia in adult men and women

Affiliations

Perceived facial age and biochemical indicators of glycemia in adult men and women

Agnieszka Żelaźniewicz et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Glycemia is linked with one of the key mechanisms underlying the aging process and inter-individual differences in biological age. Previous research showed that glucose level is linked with perceived age in elder individuals. This study aimed to verify if glycemia is related to perceived facial age in healthy adult individuals as interventions in younger and healthy cohorts are crucial for preventing the onset of age-related diseases. The study sample consisted of 116 healthy men of mean age 35.53 ± 3.54 years (29.95-44.29) and 163 healthy women of mean age 28.38 ± 2.40 (24.25-34.17) years. Glycemia was evaluated by fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and glycated hemoglobin level. BMI, facial sexual dimorphism, estradiol, testosterone, and hsCRP levels were controlled. Perceived age was evaluated based on standardized facial photos in an online survey. Additionally perceived facial aging was calculated as a difference between perceived age and chronological age. No relationship between the levels of biochemical indicators of glycemia and perceived facial age or aging was found both in men and women, also when controlled for possible confounders. This study shows that perceived facial age in adult individuals is rather linked with body adiposity of sexual dimorphism but not with glycemic markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finkel D, Whitfield K, McGue M. Genetic and environmental influences on functional age: A twin study. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 1995;50:104–113. doi: 10.1093/geronb/50B.2.P104. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freude G, Jakob O, Martus P, Rose U, Seibt R. Predictors of the discrepancy between calendar and biological age. Occup. Med. 2010;60:21–28. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp113. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gunn DA, Murray PG, Tomlin CC, Rexbye H, Christensen K, Mayes AE. Perceived age as a biomarker of ageing: A clinical methodology. Biogerontology. 2008;9:357–364. doi: 10.1007/s10522-008-9141-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karasik D, Demissie S, Cupples LA, Kiel DP. Disentangling the genetic determinants of human aging: Biological age as an alternative to the use of survival measures. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2005;60:574–587. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.5.574. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belsky DW, Caspi A, Houts R, Cohen HJ, Corcoran DL, Danese A, Harrington H, Israel S, Levine ME, Schaefer JD, Sugden K, Williams B, Yashin AI, Poulton R, Moffitt TE. Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2015;112:E4104–E4110. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501574112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types