Risk Assessment Instruments for Intimate Partner Femicide: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 35712218
- PMCID: PMC9195003
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896901
Risk Assessment Instruments for Intimate Partner Femicide: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Intimate partner violence is a severe problem that has taken the lives of thousands of women worldwide, and it is bound to continue in the future. Numerous risk assessment instruments have been developed to identify and intervene in high-risk cases. However, a synthesis of specific instruments for severe violence against women by male partners has not been identified. This type of violence has specific characteristics compared to other forms of intimate partner violence, requiring individualized attention. A systematic review of the literature has been conducted to summarize the intimate partner homicide risk assessment instruments applied to this population. It has been carried out with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guidelines. The search strategy yielded a total of 1,156 studies, and only 33 studies met eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The data of these studies were extracted, analyzed, and presented on study characteristics (country and year, sample, data sources, purpose of the studies) and main findings (a brief description of the instruments, risk factor items, psychometric properties). The results indicate that the Danger Assessment, the Danger Assessment for Immigrants, the Danger Assessment for Law Enforcement, the Danger Assessment-5, the Taiwan Intimate Partner Violence Danger Assessment, the Severe Intimate Partner Risk Prediction Scale, The Lethality Screen, and the H-Scale are specific risk assessment instruments for predicting homicide and attempted homicide. There are differences in the number and content of risk assessment items, but most of them include the evidence's critical factors associated with homicide. Validity and reliability scores of these instruments vary, being consistency and accuracy medium-high for estimating homicide. Finally, implications for prediction and prevention are noted, and future research directions are discussed.
Keywords: homicide; intimate partner violence; prediction; risk assessment; systematic review; women.
Copyright © 2022 Garcia-Vergara, Almeda, Fernández-Navarro and Becerra-Alonso.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Validity and Reliability of Available Intimate Partner Homicide and Reassault Risk Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Jan;22(1):18-40. doi: 10.1177/1524838018821952. Epub 2019 Jan 22. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021. PMID: 30669956
-
Pregnancy-associated violent deaths: the role of intimate partner violence.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007 Apr;8(2):135-48. doi: 10.1177/1524838007301223. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007. PMID: 17545571 Review.
-
Double jeopardy: Predictors of elevated lethality risk among intimate partner violence victims seen in emergency departments.Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.035. Epub 2017 Jul 5. Prev Med. 2017. PMID: 28687475
-
Can Justice System Interventions Prevent Intimate Partner Homicide? An Analysis of Rates of Help Seeking Prior to Fatality.J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):8792-8816. doi: 10.1177/0886260519851179. Epub 2019 Jun 4. J Interpers Violence. 2021. PMID: 31161856
-
Adult femicide victims in forensic autopsy in Taiwan: A 10-year retrospective study.Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Sep;266:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 17. Forensic Sci Int. 2016. PMID: 27235593
Cited by
-
Leaking in Intimate Partner Homicide: A Systematic Review.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Oct;25(4):3005-3019. doi: 10.1177/15248380241237213. Epub 2024 Mar 29. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024. PMID: 38551126 Free PMC article.
-
Unveiling the determinants of femicide in Ecuador: a comprehensive analysis.Front Sociol. 2025 Jan 3;9:1452438. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1452438. eCollection 2024. Front Sociol. 2025. PMID: 39830691 Free PMC article.
-
Forensic homicidal strangulation in women: Case series and systematic literature review.Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2025 Feb 17;10:100577. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100577. eCollection 2025 Jun. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2025. PMID: 40034148 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the measurement properties of intimate partner violence screening instruments for the general population: A COSMIN-based international systematic review.PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0310297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310297. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39541374 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing risk indicators of intimate partner femicide considering victim's coping strategies to violence: A dynamic multilevel linear mixed model based on genetic algorithms.Heliyon. 2024 Sep 13;10(18):e37827. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37827. eCollection 2024 Sep 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39318806 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adams H., Cervantes P., Jang J., Dixon D. (2014). “Chapter 25-standardized assessment,” in Evidence-Based Treatment for Children with Autism, Practical Resources for the Mental Health Professional, eds D. Granpeesheh, J. Tarbox, A. C. Najdowski, and J. Kornack (San Diego, CA: Academic Press; ), 501–516.
-
- Anderson K. L.. (2005). Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles. 52, 853–865. 10.1007/s11199-005-4204-x - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous