Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 17;12(1):10251.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14173-2.

Revisiting sea-level budget by considering all potential impact factors for global mean sea-level change estimation

Affiliations

Revisiting sea-level budget by considering all potential impact factors for global mean sea-level change estimation

Fengwei Wang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Accurate estimates of global sea-level change from the observations of Altimetry, Argo and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-on (GRACE-FO) are of great value for investigating the global sea-level budget. In this study, we analyzed the global sea-level change over the period from January 2005 to December 2019 by considering all potential impact factors, i.e. three factors for Altimetry observations (two Altimetry products, ocean bottom deformation (OBD) and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA)), three factors for Argo observations (four Argo products, salinity product error and deep-ocean steric sea-level change), and seven factors for GRACE/GRACE-FO observations including three official RL06 solutions, five spatial filtering methods, three GIA models, two C20 (degree 2 order 0) products, Geocenter motion, GAD field and global mass conservation. The seven impact factors of GRACE/GRACE-FO observations lead to ninety combinations for the post-procession of global mean barystatic sea-level change estimation, whose rates range from 2.00 to 2.45 mm/year. The total uncertainty of global barystatic sea-level change rate is ± 0.27 mm/year at the 95% confidence level, estimated as the standard deviation of the differences between the different datasets constituting the ensembles. The statistical results show that the preferred GIA model developed by Caron et al. in 2018 can improve the closure of the global sea-level budget by 0.20-0.30 mm/year, which is comparable with that of neglecting the halosteric component. About 30.8% of total combinations (GRACE/GRACE-FO plus Argo) can close the global sea-level budget within 1-sigma (0.23 mm/year) of Altimetry observations, 88.9% within 2-sigma. Once the adopted factors including GRACE/GRACE-FO solutions from Center for Space Research (CSR), Caron18 GIA model, SWENSON filtering and Argo product from China Second Institute of Oceanography, the linear trend of global sterodynamic sea-level change derived from GRACE/GRACE-FO plus Argo observations is 3.85 ± 0.14 mm/year, nearly closed to 3.90 ± 0.23 mm/year of Altimetry observations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The impact factors of global sea-level change estimated from Altimetry, Argo and RL06 solutions of GRACE/GRACE-FO observations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The global mean sterodynamic sea-level change series over January 2005 to December 2019 with two Altimetry products.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The global mean thermosteric sea-level change derived from four Argo products. The ensemble mean of four components is displayed as a black line.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The linear trends of four potential impact factors on global mean barystatic sea-level change estimations over the study period. (a) Processing center, (b) C20 correction, (c) Filtering method and (d) GIA correction.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The global mean sterodynamic and sea-level change estimation from Altimetry and Argo plus GRACE and GRACE-FO observations and corresponding differences from 2005 to 2019.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Linear trends of the global sea-level budget over January 2005 to December 2019 for Altimetry, Argo and GRACE/GRACE-FO observations over the sub-ensembles according to (a) processing center, (b) C20 correction, (c) filtering method, (d) GIA correction and (e) Argo product.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Global and regional ocean mass budget closure since 2003.
    Ludwigsen CB, Andersen OB, Marzeion B, Malles JH, Müller Schmied H, Döll P, Watson C, King MA. Ludwigsen CB, et al. Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 15;15(1):1416. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45726-w. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38360958 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Gregory JM, Grifes SM, Hughes CW, et al. Concepts and terminology for sea level: Mean, variability and change, both local and global. Surv. Geophys. 2019;40:1251–1289. doi: 10.1007/s10712-019-09525-z. - DOI
    1. WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group Global sea level budget 1993-present. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2018;10:1551–1590. doi: 10.5194/essd-10-1551-2018. - DOI
    1. Chen JL, Tapley B, Save H, Tamisiea ME, Bettadpur S, Ries J. Quantification of ocean mass change using gravity recovery and climate experiment, satellite altimeter, and Argo floats observations. J. Geophys. Res-Sol. Earth. 2018;123:10212–10225. doi: 10.1029/2018JB016095. - DOI
    1. Llovel W, Purkey S, Meyssignac B, Blazquez A, Kolodziejczyk N, Bamber J. Global ocean freshening, ocean mass increase and global mean sea level rise over 2005–2015. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):17717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54239-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nerem RS, Chambers DP, Choe C, Mitchum GT. Estimating mean sea level change from the TOPEX and Jason altimeter missions. Mar. Geod. 2010;33(S1):435–446. doi: 10.1080/01490419.2010.491031. - DOI

Publication types