Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 Oct;9(5):3593-3596.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13980. Epub 2022 Jun 17.

Combined mechanical circulatory support for ventricular fibrillation in left ventricular assist device patient

Affiliations
Case Reports

Combined mechanical circulatory support for ventricular fibrillation in left ventricular assist device patient

Mahmood Abu Akel et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Ventricular fibrillation, a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia, may result in pulselessness, loss of consciousness and sudden cardiac death. In this case report, we describe our experience in managing a 54-year-old man with HeartMate3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to transplantation due to dilated non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, presenting with incessant ventricular arrhythmia for 35 days despite multiple attempts to restore normal rhythm with external direct current cardioversion and anti-arrhythmic medications. The patient remained stable in ventricular arrhythmia with no progression to asystole, but hemodynamic collapse due to right heart failure occurred in the third week. Combined use of two mechanical circulatory support devices (LVAD with VA ECMO) was needed to achieve haemodynamic and metabolic stability, eventually leading to successful heart transplantation in the index admission. The patient was discharged home 2 weeks after transplantation in good clinical condition.

Keywords: Case report; Combined ECMO and LVAD; Heart transplantation post ECMO and LVAD; Ventricular arrhythmia in LVAD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Case report timeline.

References

    1. Saxon LA, Bristow MR, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, Marco TD, Carson P, DiCarlo L, Feldman AM, Galle E, Ecklund F. Predictors of sudden cardiac death and appropriate shock in the comparison of medical therapy, pacing, and defibrillation in heart failure (COMPANION) trial. Circulation 2006; 114: 2766–2772. - PubMed
    1. Yap SC, Ramjankhan F, Muslem R, de Jonge N, Kirkels HJ, Akin S, Manintveld OC, Birim O, Szili‐Torok T, Caliskan K. Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with a continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68: 323–325. - PubMed
    1. Raasch H, Jensen BC, Chang PP, Mounsey JP, Gehi AK, Chung EH, Sheridan BC, Bowen A, Katz JN. Epidemiology, management, and outcomes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias after continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device implantation. Am Heart J 2012; 164: 373–378. - PubMed
    1. Ziv O, Dizon J, Thosani A, Naka Y, Magnano AR, Garan H. Effects of left ventricular assist device therapy on ventricular arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1428–1434. - PubMed
    1. Refaat M, Chemaly E, Lebeche D, Gwathmey JK, Hajjar RJ. Ventricular arrhythmias after left ventricular assist device implantation. PACE 2008; 31: 1246–1252. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types