A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children
- PMID: 35718001
- PMCID: PMC9875229
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.05.003
A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to estimate the performance of single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations in the preoperative evaluation of solid abdominal tumors and their relationship with relevant adjacent structures in children.
Methods: This retrospective study included 50 pediatric patients with malignant solid abdominal tumors treated with surgical resection between 2009-2017. Preoperative computed tomography and ultrasonography were compared to operative findings (gold standard) in the diagnosis of invasion or encasement of adjacent structures. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated.
Results: Renal (20.4%) and neuroblastic (19.4%) tumors were the most common. Complete surgical resection with negative margins was achieved in 44 (88%) patients. The comparison between single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography findings showed the following results: sensitivity = 90.3% vs 86.6%, specificity = 86.8% vs 94.6%, negative predictive value = 95.3% vs 94.4%, positive predictive value = 75.3% vs 86.9%, and accuracy = 87.9% vs 92.2%. The correlation (kappa index) between computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations was 0.72 (p < 0.001). In 14% (7/50) of the patients, the invasion of adjacent structures was diagnosed by ultrasonography but not by computed tomography (1 patient had 2 invaded structures).
Conclusion: Ultrasonography can be considered a complementary method to single-phase-enhanced computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of children with an abdominal tumor. The present study showed that ultrasonography and single-phase-enhanced computed tomography each possess a high accuracy in the preoperative planning of resection of solid abdominal tumors in children. Thus, it seems that the combination of both imaging methods would be enough for the evaluation of most abdominal tumors in the pediatric population.
Keywords: Computed tomography; Neoplasms; Pediatrics; Surgery; Ultrasonography.
Copyright © 2022 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Making good use of ultrasound for abdominal tumors in children.J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023 Jan-Feb;99(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Oct 10. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023. PMID: 36228667 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30. - PubMed
-
- van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Hol JA, Pritchard-Jones K, van Tinteren H, Furtwangler R, Verschuur AC, et al. Position paper: Rationale for the treatment of Wilms tumour in the UMBRELLA SIOP-RTSG 2016 protocol. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14:743–752. - PubMed
-
- Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, Aareleid T, Bielska-Lasota M, Clavel J, et al. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5–a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:35–47. - PubMed
-
- Brillantino C, Rossi E, Minelli R, Bignardi E, Coppola M, Zeccolini R. Current role of imaging in the management of children with Wilms Tumor according to the new UMBRELLA protocol. Trans Med. 2019;9:206.
