Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;8(5):1149-1157.
doi: 10.1002/cre2.605. Epub 2022 Jun 19.

Agreement of in vitro orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and digital models using Maestro 3D ortho studio software

Affiliations

Agreement of in vitro orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and digital models using Maestro 3D ortho studio software

Elaheh Rafiei et al. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Diagnostic casts are one of the standard components of orthodontic records. But they have several drawbacks such as the need for physical space for storage and the risk of breaking due to their brittle composition. Today, the digitalization of orthodontic models is a progress in orthodontics. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate common orthodontic linear measurements on plaster casts and digital 3D models using Maestro 3D ortho studio® scanner and software (AGE Solutions®, Pontedera, Italy).

Materials and methods: Study casts of 30 orthodontic patients were selected. Tooth width, space analysis, Bolton analysis, overjet, overbite, and linear measurements of dental arch dimensions were performed by two examiners on plaster casts and digital models.

Statistical analysis: Intra- and interexaminer agreements were evaluated in both manual and digital methods and paired t test was used for evaluating the agreement between the manual and digital measurement. The significance level was set at 0.05.

Results: The intraexaminer agreement was excellent (ICC > 0.75) for most variables in both manual and digital methods. The correlation between the two examiners was significant (p < .05) for most manual and digital measurements. The differences between the manual and digital measurements, although maybe statistically significant, were not clinically significant for most variables.

Conclusion: The use of "Maestro 3D" (AGE Solutions, Pontedera, Italy) scanner and software was acceptable for orthodontic diagnostic measurements instead of study casts.

Keywords: dental model; orthodontics; plaster casts; software; three-dimensional imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An overview of the Maestro 3D ortho studio® (AGE Solutions®, Pontedera, Italy) environment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abizadeh, N. , Moles, D. R. , O'Neill, J. , & Noar, J. H. (2012). Digital versus plaster study models: How accurate and reproducible are they? Journal of Orthodontics, 39(3), 151–159. 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asquith, J. , Gillgrass, T. , & Mossey, P. (2007). Three‐dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: A pilot study. European Journal of Orthodontics, 29(5), 517–522. 10.1093/ejo/cjm044 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Camardella, L. T. , Breuning, H. , & Vilella, O. V. (2017). Are there differences between comparison methods used to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of digital models? Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 22(1), 65–74. 10.1590/2177-6709.22.1.065-074.oar - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Czarnota, J. , Hey, J. , & Fuhrmann, R. (2016). Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts: Intrarater reliability and validity. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie: Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 77(1), 22–30. 10.1007/s00056-015-0004-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. El‐Zanaty, H. M ., El‐Beialy, A. R ., Abou El‐Ezz, A. M ., Attia, K. H. , El‐Bialy, A. R. , & Mostafa, Y. A . (2010). Three‐dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 137 (2), 259–265. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.030 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types