Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 14;7(3):e569.
doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000569. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.

Improving Knowledge of Active Safety and QI Projects Amongst Practitioners in a Pediatric ICU

Affiliations

Improving Knowledge of Active Safety and QI Projects Amongst Practitioners in a Pediatric ICU

Brian F Flaherty et al. Pediatr Qual Saf. .

Abstract

Introduction: The success of quality improvement (QI) projects depends on many factors, with communication and knowledge of project-specific practice change being fundamental. This project aimed to improve the knowledge of active safety and QI projects.

Methods: Two interventions were trialed to improve knowledge: paired email and meeting announcements followed by a daily huddle to review ongoing projects. Knowledge, measured as the ability to recall a project and its practice change, was the primary outcome. The frequency and duration of the Huddle were process and balancing measures, respectively.

Results: Seven days after a meeting/email announcement, 3 of 13 (23%) faculty and fellows recalled the announced practice change. Investigators then tested the effects of the Huddle by assessing practitioners' knowledge of safety and QI project-related practice changes on the first and last day of a service week. The average percentage of items recalled increased from the beginning to end of a service week by 33% [46% to 79%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12-53] for faculty and 27% (51% to 77%, 95% CI 13-40) for fellows. The Huddle occurred in four of seven (interquartile range 2-5) days/wk with a mean duration of 4.5 (SD 2) minutes. Follow-up assessment 2 years after Huddle implementation demonstrate sustained increase in item recall [faculty +36% (95% CI +13% to 40%); fellows +35% (95% CI +23% to 47%)].

Conclusions: A daily huddle to discuss safety and QI project-related practice change is an effective and time-efficient communication method to increase knowledge of active projects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Summary of baseline analysis. A, Cause-and-effect diagram showing potential causes of low knowledge of projects. B, Key driver diagram showing project goal, driver of change, and potential interventions. * = intervention used in the project.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The Huddle Sheet is an 8.5 × 11 inch sheet of green, laminated paper attached to the mobile computer used by faculty and fellows for rounds.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The p-chart includes data for 20 months from a project to reduce the proportion of code events missing documentation in the electronic health record. Months 2, 3, and 4 had no codes. The project was added to the Huddle after week 12, decreasing missing documentation is noted in weeks 13–20.

References

    1. Moraros J, Lemstra M, Nwankwo C. Lean interventions in healthcare: do they actually work? A systematic literature review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28:150–165. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solberg LI, Kottke TE, Brekke ML, et al. . Failure of a continuous quality improvement intervention to increase the delivery of preventive services. A randomized trial. Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3:105–115. - PubMed
    1. Morganti KG, Lovejoy S, Haviland AM, et al. . Measuring success for health care quality improvement interventions. Med Care. 2012;50:1086–1092. - PubMed
    1. Brandrud AS, Nyen B, Hjortdahl P, et al. . Domains associated with successful quality improvement in healthcare—a nationwide case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:648. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:462–480. - PubMed