Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 3:10:903053.
doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.903053. eCollection 2022.

Synthesis of MeOH and DME From CO2 Hydrogenation Over Commercial and Modified Catalysts

Rafaelle G Santiago  1 , Juliana A Coelho  1 , Sebastião M P de Lucena  1 , Ana Paula S Musse  2 , Marcio de F Portilho  2 , Enrique Rodriguez-Castellón  3 , Diana C S de Azevedo  1 , Moises Bastos-Neto  1
Affiliations

Synthesis of MeOH and DME From CO2 Hydrogenation Over Commercial and Modified Catalysts

Rafaelle G Santiago et al. Front Chem. .

Abstract

Growing concern about climate change has been driving the search for solutions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. In this context, carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies have been proposed and developed as a way of giving CO2 a sustainable and economically viable destination. An interesting approach is the conversion of CO2 into valuable chemicals, such as methanol (MeOH) and dimethyl ether (DME), by means of catalytic hydrogenation on Cu-, Zn-, and Al-based catalysts. In this work, three catalysts were tested for the synthesis of MeOH and DME from CO2 using a single fixed-bed reactor. The first one was a commercial CuO/γ-Al2O3; the second one was CuO-ZnO/γ-Al2O3, obtained via incipient wetness impregnation of the first catalyst with an aqueous solution of zinc acetate; and the third one was a CZA catalyst obtained by the coprecipitation method. The samples were characterized by XRD, XRF, and N2 adsorption isotherms. The hydrogenation of CO2 was performed at 25 bar, 230°C, with a H2:CO2 ratio of 3 and space velocity of 1,200 ml (g cat · h)-1 in order to assess the potential of these catalysts in the conversion of CO2 to methanol and dimethyl ether. The catalyst activity was correlated to the adsorption isotherms of each reactant. The main results show that the highest CO2 conversion and the best yield of methanol are obtained with the CZACP catalyst, very likely due to its higher adsorption capacity of H2. In addition, although the presence of zinc oxide reduces the textural properties of the porous catalyst, CZAWI showed higher CO2 conversion than commercial catalyst CuO/γ-Al2O3.

Keywords: CO2; DME; catalysis; fixed bed; methanol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Experimental setup.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
XRD patterns of the catalysts before (A) and after (B) reactional tests.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
N2 adsorption isotherms at −196°C for catalysts (A) before and (B) after reaction.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
CO2 and H2 isotherms on (A) CA, (B) CZAWI, and (C) CZACP.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
CO2 isobars on CA, CZAWI, and CZACP catalysts.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
H2 isobars on CA, CZAWI, and CZACP.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Methanol concentration at the outlet of the reactor using CA, CZAWI, and CZACP.
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
DME concentration at the end of the reactor using CA, CZAWI, and CZACP.
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 9
CO concentration at the end of the reactor using CA, CZAWI, and CZACP.
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 10
CO2 conversion with time using CA, CZAWI, and CZACP.
FIGURE 11
FIGURE 11
Selectivity of methanol (A), DME (B), and carbon monoxide (C) for tested catalysts.
FIGURE 12
FIGURE 12
Product selectivity and CO2 conversion (hatched area) at a steady state.
FIGURE 13
FIGURE 13
Product yield at a steady state.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aboul-Fotouh S. M. K. (2014). Production of Dimethylether (DME) as a Clean Fuel Using Sonochemically Prepared CuO And/or ZnO-Modified γ -alumina Catalysts. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 42, 3. 10.1016/S1872-5813(14)60020-7 - DOI
    1. Adnan M. A., Kibria M. G. (2020). Comparative Techno-Economic and Life-Cycle Assessment of Power-To-Methanol Synthesis Pathways. Appl. Energy 278, 115614. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115614 - DOI
    1. Afshar Taromi A., Kaliaguine S. (2018). Green Diesel Production via Continuous Hydrotreatment of Triglycerides over Mesostructured γ-alumina Supported NiMo/CoMo Catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 171, 20–30. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.10.024 - DOI
    1. Aguayo A. T., Ereña J., Mier D., Arandes J. M., Olazar M., Bilbao J. (2007). Kinetic Modeling of Dimethyl Ether Synthesis in a Single Step on a CuO−ZnO−Al2O3/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 5522–5530. 10.1021/ie070269s - DOI
    1. Ahouari H., Soualah A., Le Valant A., Pinard L., Magnoux P., Pouilloux Y. (2013). Methanol Synthesis from CO2 Hydrogenation over Copper Based Catalysts. Reac Kinet. Mech. Cat. 110, 131–145. 10.1007/s11144-013-0587-9 - DOI