Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Gluteus Medius during Gait in Patients following a Stroke

Abstract

Many stroke patients rely on cane or ankle-foot orthosis during gait rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) to the gluteus medius (GMed) and tibialis anterior (TA) on gait performance in stroke patients, including those who needed assistive devices. Fourteen stroke patients were enrolled in this study (mean poststroke duration: 194.9 ± 189.6 d; mean age: 72.8 ± 10.7 y). Participants walked 14 m at a comfortable velocity with and without FES to the GMed and TA. After an adaptation period, lower-limb motion was measured using magnetic inertial measurement units attached to the pelvis and the lower limb of the affected side. Motion range of angle of the affected thigh and shank segments in the sagittal plane, motion range of the affected hip and knee extension-flexion angle, step time, and stride time were calculated from inertial measurement units during the middle ten walking strides. Gait velocity, cadence, and stride length were also calculated. These gait indicators, both with and without FES, were compared. Gait velocity was significantly faster with FES (p = 0.035). Similarly, stride length and motion range of the shank of the affected side were significantly greater with FES (stride length: p = 0.018; motion range of the shank: p = 0.026). Meanwhile, cadence showed no significant difference (p = 0.238) in gait with or without FES. Similarly, range of motion of the affected hip joint, knee joint, and thigh did not differ significantly depending on FES condition (p = 0.115-0.529). FES to the GMed and TA during gait produced an improvement in gait velocity, stride length, and motion range of the shank. Our results will allow therapists to use FES on stroke patients with varying conditions.

Figure 1

Schematic diagram of functional electrical stimulation (FES) control. The solid line represents wired processing, and the broken line represents wireless processing. The FES was held by the patient. Orange dots mark the position of the magnetic inertial measurement units (IMU).

Figure 2

Average and standard deviation bars for gait parameters without and with FES. (a) Gait velocity. (b) Stride length. (c) Cadence. (d) Range of motion of affected hip. (e) Range of motion of affected hip knee. (f) Range of motion of affected thigh. (g) Range of motion of affected shank.