Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug;22(8):371-383.
doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01478-9. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

Gut Factors Mediating the Physiological Impact of Bariatric Surgery

Affiliations
Review

Gut Factors Mediating the Physiological Impact of Bariatric Surgery

Maigen Bethea et al. Curr Diab Rep. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Despite decades of obesity research and various public health initiatives, obesity remains a major public health concern. Our most drastic but most effective treatment of obesity is bariatric surgery with weight loss and improvements in co-morbidities, including resolution of type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the mechanisms by which surgery elicits metabolic benefits are still not well understood. One proposed mechanism is through signals generated by the intestine (nutrients, neuronal, and/or endocrine) that communicate nutrient status to the brain. In this review, we discuss the contributions of gut-brain communication to the physiological regulation of body weight and its impact on the success of bariatric surgery. Advancing our understanding of the mechanisms that drive bariatric surgery-induced metabolic benefits will ultimately lead to the identification of novel, less invasive strategies to treat obesity.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Gut hormones; Obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Anatomical and metabolic changes induced by vertical sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A) VSG is a procedure where 80% of the stomach along the greater curvature is removed. RYGB creates a gastric pouch and the intestine is rearranged such that ingested food bypasses 95% of the stomach and the upper intestinal tract. B) While the anatomy of RYGB and VSG surgeries differ, the two share similarities such as increases in sustained weight loss and rapid nutrient entry as well as the resolution of Type 2 Diabetes and some mild differences in gut peptide responses. Created with BioRender.com
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in food intake and body weight over time in rodent models of bariatric surgery. Food intake after bariatric surgery in rodents is reduced during the first two–three weeks post-operatively, and then returns to, but never exceeds, the level of food intake seen in the sham animals [10, 11]. If an animal is food restricted (FR) for a period of time and body weight is lost, once returned to ad lib feeding, the animal will ingest more food than unrestricted animals until body weight returns to what it would have been had the animal never been restricted, something that does not occur with VSG [10]. Overall, this suggests that there are two phases to bariatric surgery, the initial weight loss phase with reduced food intake, and a second phase where hyperphagia is prevented and the weight loss is sustained
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of intestinal signals and cues that are altered after bariatric surgery. 1) After VSG and RYGB there are changes in the flow of nutrients, gut-generated peptides, and neuronal activation. 2) Increases in nutrient flow along with alterations in nutrient handling (i.e., increased glucose rate of appearance) can lead to the increased secretion of gut signals such as hormones and bile acids. Specific regions of the CNS (NTS and AP) are also activated after a meal. This increased activation may be due to direct neural innervation, the altered nutrient flow 3) or increases in gut-generated signals, such as 4) gut peptides, FGF19/15, bile acids, and/or the microbiome. Created with BioRender.com

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Jensen MD, Pories WJ, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009; 122:248–256 e5. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1567–76. 10.1056/NEJMoa1200225 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, Dixon J, Liem R, Ottosson J, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the Fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018. Obes Surg Obes Surg. 2019;29:782–95. 10.1007/S11695-018-3593-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sandoval DA. Mechanisms for the metabolic success of bariatric surgery. J Neuroendocr. 2019; 31:e12708. 10.1111/jne.12708 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li J, Lai D, Wu D. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to treat morbid obesity-related comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg Springer; 2016. p. 429–42. Doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1996-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources