Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high-efficacy assisted reproductive technology
- PMID: 35725118
- PMCID: PMC9348809
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.020
Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high-efficacy assisted reproductive technology
Abstract
The high efficacy of modern assisted reproductive technology (ART) and increase in the number of noninfertile patients who are using ART for family building in the United States call into question the relevance of the standard, one-size-fits-all infertility evaluation. Here, we explore whether all patients presenting for ART need uterine cavity and tubal assessment and what tests are most appropriate, efficient, and cost-effective in current times.
Keywords: Saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS); hydrosalpinx; hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy); hysterosalpingography (HSG); hysteroscopy.
Copyright © 2022 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest, commercial or otherwise.
Figures

Render modes: LEFT COLUMN: greyscale and Volume Contrast Imaging, CENTER COLUMN: HDlive, a.k.a. virtual hysteroscopy; RIGHT COLUMN: Automatic Volume Calculation software (SonoAVC)
Cases: TOP ROW (A): Normal uterus with normal uterine cavity shape and volume; MIDDLE ROW (B): Intrauterine synechiae and small uterine cavity volume due to presence of adhesions; BOTTOM ROW (C): Septate uterus with endometrial polyp in left part of uterine cavity.


(A) 2D-HyFoSy in grey scale (LEFT) and tissue Doppler imaging (CENTER and RIGHT);
(B) 3D-HyFoSy in grey scale (LEFT), HDlive render mode (CENTER and RIGHT);
(C) 3D-HyFoSy and power Doppler. Power Doppler generates a highly useful sign called flaming tubes sign and makes diagnosis very easy to interpret for low and medium experienced users (53).
Similar articles
-
Contrast ultrasonography for tubal patency.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):994-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Jun 6. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24910933 Review.
-
Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;204(1):79.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.065. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21187197
-
Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):758-769. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex013. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28184447
-
Evaluating Fallopian Tube Patency: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.Radiographics. 2021 Oct;41(6):1876-18961. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021210033. Radiographics. 2021. PMID: 34597232
-
Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Radiol. 2020 Apr;125:108891. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108891. Epub 2020 Feb 20. Eur J Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32088657
Cited by
-
The Role of Hysteroscopy in the Assessment of Fallopian Tubal Patency: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024 Jul 9;84(7):619-628. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-5018. eCollection 2024 Jul. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024. PMID: 38993802 Free PMC article.
-
A Large Study About Reproductive Factors That Predict Hysterosalpingography-Identified Tubal Pathology: An Insight into the Necessity of Preconception Screening.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 31;14(1):179. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010179. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39797266 Free PMC article.
-
Spontaneous Pregnancy after 4D-Hysterosalpingo-Sonography (HyCoSy) in the Same Menstrual Cycle: A Case Report and an Updating Review of the Current Literature regarding the Positive Impact of Tubal Flushing Effect on Fertility.Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun 11;2024:7774854. doi: 10.1155/2024/7774854. eCollection 2024. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38962290 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence diagnosis of intrauterine adhesion by 3D ultrasound imaging: a prospective study.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Apr 1;13(4):2314-2327. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-965. Epub 2023 Mar 22. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023. PMID: 37064348 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fertility evaluation of infertile women: a committee opinion. Fertility and sterility. 2021;116. - PubMed
-
- Vitale SG, Haimovich S, Lagana AS, Alonso L, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Carugno J, et al. Endometrial polyps. An evidence-based diagnosis and management guide. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;260:70–7. - PubMed
-
- Perez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F, Redondo T, Sanfrutos L, Alvarez P, et al. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1632–5. - PubMed
-
- Kodaman PH. Hysteroscopic polypectomy for women undergoing IVF treatment: when is it necessary? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28:184–90. - PubMed
-
- Lieng M, Istre O, Qvigstad E. Treatment of endometrial polyps: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:992–1002. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous