Reply of the Authors: Quality or quantity? Pitfalls of assessing the effect of endometrial thickness on live birth rates

Affiliations

¹ The Montreal Fertility Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
² BORN Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.
³ Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Free article

Comment

Neal Mahutte et al. Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug.

Free article

. 2022 Aug;118(2):429.

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.014. Epub 2022 Jun 18.

¹ The Montreal Fertility Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
² BORN Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.
³ Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

No abstract available

Comment on

Optimal endometrial thickness in fresh and frozen-thaw in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of live birth rates from 96,000 autologous embryo transfers.
Mahutte N, Hartman M, Meng L, Lanes A, Luo ZC, Liu KE. Mahutte N, et al. Fertil Steril. 2022 Apr;117(4):792-800. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.025. Epub 2022 Jan 31. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 35109980
Quality or quantity? Pitfalls of assessing the effect of endometrial thickness on live birth rates.
Ata B, Kalafat E. Ata B, et al. Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug;118(2):428. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.015. Epub 2022 Jun 18. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 35725672 No abstract available.