Regarding "Loss of seton in patients with complex anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot‑free seton" by Verkade et al
- PMID: 35726037
- PMCID: PMC9458569
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02637-6
Regarding "Loss of seton in patients with complex anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot‑free seton" by Verkade et al
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Authors' reply to the letter about "loss of seton in patients with complex-anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot-free seton" by Horeman-Franse.Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Oct;26(10):845-846. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02671-4. Tech Coloproctol. 2022. PMID: 36006572 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Loss of seton in patients with complex anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot-free seton.Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct;24(10):1043-1046. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02254-1. Epub 2020 Jun 19. Tech Coloproctol. 2020. PMID: 32562152
References
-
- Horeman T, Nerkens W (2019) U.S. Patent Application No. 16/345324
-
- Horeman T, Nerkens W, Van Delft F, Bemelman WA (2020) U.S. Patent No. 10842475
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
